Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 3, 2020. It is now read-only.

Update links to docs #161

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update links to docs #161

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tools/ServiceAccountCLI/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
# The SpatialOS Online Services: Service account CLI tool

See the documentation [Online Services section of the SpatialOS documentation website](https://documentation.improbable.io/online-services/docs), specifically the [Service account CLI tool documentation](https://documentation.improbable.io/online-services/docs/platform-service-account-cli).
See the documentation [Online Services section of the SpatialOS documentation website](https://online-services.readme.io/docs/welcome), specifically the [Service account CLI tool documentation](https://online-services.readme.io/docs/platform-service-account-cli).
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These links present me with a login page. That right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, good point. I think the plan was to give access to anyone who needed it, via a ReadMe account. I'll give you access now - or at least try to (with ReadMe it's never as easy as it should be).

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, so we have to invite users to create a readme account to read these docs? Can these docs not be public, given that the tools it is documenting are public on Github?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's another good point. I'm not 100% sure of the background to this move, but from what you're saying, it sounds like we can keep these docs public but just not have them on our main docs site. Will double-check with the other TWs first thing tomorrow in case I've missed some context, but it sounds like it should be fine.