-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Update links to docs #161
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update links to docs #161
Conversation
Karl spotted that these were wrong.
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | |||
# The SpatialOS Online Services: Service account CLI tool | |||
|
|||
See the documentation [Online Services section of the SpatialOS documentation website](https://documentation.improbable.io/online-services/docs), specifically the [Service account CLI tool documentation](https://documentation.improbable.io/online-services/docs/platform-service-account-cli). | |||
See the documentation [Online Services section of the SpatialOS documentation website](https://online-services.readme.io/docs/welcome), specifically the [Service account CLI tool documentation](https://online-services.readme.io/docs/platform-service-account-cli). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These links present me with a login page. That right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, good point. I think the plan was to give access to anyone who needed it, via a ReadMe account. I'll give you access now - or at least try to (with ReadMe it's never as easy as it should be).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wait, so we have to invite users to create a readme account to read these docs? Can these docs not be public, given that the tools it is documenting are public on Github?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's another good point. I'm not 100% sure of the background to this move, but from what you're saying, it sounds like we can keep these docs public but just not have them on our main docs site. Will double-check with the other TWs first thing tomorrow in case I've missed some context, but it sounds like it should be fine.
Lots of broken docs links in this repo, fwiw: https://github.com/spatialos/online-services/search?q=online-services&type=code |
Karl spotted that these were wrong - I've just updated them.