Fix interference with coc-tsserver

[knpwrs]

Summary

coc-tsserver has the following notice in its README:

Note: for React to work as expected, you need your JSX filetype to be javascript.jsx or javascriptreact and your TSX filetype to be typescript.jsx or typescript.tsx or typescriptreact.

With the setting that vim-prettier uses (typescript), tsx files become an error-riddled mess with coc-tsserver.

I've found that vim-prettier works better than coc-prettier, so I'd prefer to keep vim-prettier installed rather than use coc-prettier.

Test Plan

1. Confirm prettier still works as expected (appears to work for me)

[mitermayer]

Hi @knpwrs,

Thank you for this PR! On the PR https://github.com/prettier/vim-prettier/pull/272/files @johanventer has updated to remove the augroup in favour of the a single prettier group.

Could you please rebase and follow similar principles? After that this should be good to be merged.

How would this conflict with #279 ? @yzia2000 would this be a problem ?

[yzia2000]

Hi @knpwrs,

Thank you for this PR! On the PR https://github.com/prettier/vim-prettier/pull/272/files @johanventer has updated to remove the augroup in favour of the a single prettier group.

Could you please rebase and follow similar principles? After that this should be good to be merged.

How would this conflict with #279 ? @yzia2000 would this be a problem ?

I used typescriptreact instead of typescript.tsx because the additive support for react files. This was inspired by this comment: vim/vim#4830 (comment). This also happens to be the way default runtime .vim files change ft.
However, I suspect that using typescriptreact is causing #280 although I am not entirely sure.
Give me a bit to investigate on which filetype to revert to by default, typescript.tsx or typescriptreact.

UPDATE

I think #280 is unrelated to the typescriptreact change. I would support using javascriptreact instead of javascript.jsx and typescriptreact instead of typescript.tsx

[yzia2000]

Please look into typescriptreact and javascriptreact.

[yzia2000]

Any specific reason for choosing javascript.jsx. If not can you change it to javascriptreact

[knpwrs]

Only that the jsx / tsx types are more semantically correct. People can use jsx / tsx for more than just React.

[yzia2000]

Any specific reason for choosing typescript.tsx. If not can you change it to typescriptreact

[knpwrs]

It seems like #279 fixes the issue regardless. I'll close this PR for now. Thank you, all!