Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove injection of property chains over 'develops from'. #3467

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

@gouttegd gouttegd commented Jan 27, 2025

For years, Uberon had been injecting the following property chains over RO’s 'develops from' relation (RO:0002202):

'develops from' o 'part of' SubPropertyOf 'develops from'

'part of' o 'develops from' SubPropertyOf 'develops from'

An attempt to upstream those property chains into RO did not find any support, and in fact the weak consensus is rather that those chains serve no useful purpose.

So, this PR completely removes those chains from Uberon.

closes #2723

For years, Uberon had been injecting the following property chains over
RO’s 'develops from' relation (RO:0002202):

  'develops from' o 'part of' SubPropertyOf 'develops from'

  'part of' o 'develops from' SubPropertyOf 'develops from'

An attempt to upstream those property chains into RO did not find any
support, and in fact the weak consensus is rather that those chains
serve no useful purpose (oborel/obo-relations#814).

So, we completely remove those chains from Uberon.
@gouttegd gouttegd requested a review from matentzn as a code owner January 27, 2025 13:59
@gouttegd gouttegd self-assigned this Jan 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@matentzn matentzn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Technically LGTM. My full approval is given that

An oborel/obo-relations#814 to upstream those property chains into RO did not find any support, and in fact the weak consensus is rather that those chains serve no useful purpose.

Found consensus among the Chris and Jim.

@gouttegd gouttegd requested review from cmungall and balhoff January 27, 2025 17:00
@gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Without any explicit expression of consensus in two weeks (or any explicit expression of dissent), in two weeks from now I'll go ahead and assume the implicit consensus in oborel/obo-relations#814 is enough. That issue has been going on for long enough.

@matentzn
Copy link
Contributor

Fair, I would take the same decision as you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove property chain injection
3 participants