Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[top_earlgrey] Reduce number of PRINCE half rounds for main SRAM scrambling #24376

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

vogelpi
Copy link
Contributor

@vogelpi vogelpi commented Aug 22, 2024

This PR contains multiple commits to reduce the number of PRINCE half rounds for the main SRAM scrambling from 3 back to 2 as used for Earlgrey ES. This is done to reduce timing pressure.

The scrambling parameters of the other scrambled memory primitives (retention SRAM, ROM, OTBN IMEM & DMEM) are not touched by this PR.

Note that this PR is currently WIP. It will most likely not pass CI yet as I need to also update the tooling to support backdoor loading of memories using different numbers of scrambling rounds. But this PR is sufficient to allow the PD team kicking off another synthesis run. The RTL changes are okay and I pushed this through lint which hasn't flagged any warnings / errors.

For reference, the PRs where we increased the number of scrambling rounds in the past are:

This commit reduces the number of PRINCE half rounds for the scrambling
of the main SRAM to 2 half rounds as used in the past. This is done
to reduce timing pressure.

Signed-off-by: Pirmin Vogel <[email protected]>
@vogelpi
Copy link
Contributor Author

vogelpi commented Aug 30, 2024

This PR is superseded by #24447 which also contains the tooling changes. To allow comparing the RTL changes (must not change between this PR and #24447 because the PD team already absorbed this one), I decided to create a new one.

@vogelpi vogelpi deleted the sram-scrambling branch September 17, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ECO_C A potential candidate for an ECO
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants