Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLI 2025: Use pueblo.sfa for responder run #576

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

CLI 2025: Use pueblo.sfa for responder run #576

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025

Conversation

amotl
Copy link
Collaborator

@amotl amotl commented Jan 18, 2025

About

SFA – Single File Applications.

  • Pitch: Use PEP 723 for defining inline dependencies, like marimo and others are doing it already.
    PEP 723 – Inline script metadata pyveci/pueblo#139

  • Refactoring: Use code from pueblo to implement application launching.
    pueblo.sfa provides a few utility routines for discovering and invoking Python code.

  • Feature: Unlock loading application from remote location, using fsspec.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant updates to the Responder framework, primarily focusing on Python version support, CLI functionality, and dependency management. The changes include dropping support for Python 3.6, expanding the responder run CLI command to accept both local and remote file targets, and restructuring extension modules. The documentation has been updated to reflect these changes, with improvements to CLI usage instructions, supported Python versions, and dependency specifications.

Changes

File Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md - Updated Python version support (3.7-3.13)
- Enhanced CLI responder run command
- Moved CLI/GraphQL/OpenAPI to responder.ext namespace
README.md - Updated supported Python version from 3.6+ to 3.7+
docs/source/cli.rst - Expanded CLI documentation
- Added sections for local and remote file launching
- Improved command examples
docs/source/conf.py - Added linkcheck_anchors_ignore_for_url configuration
docs/source/index.rst - Updated supported Python version to 3.7+
responder/api.py - Simplified ExceptionMiddleware import
responder/util/python.py - Simplified load_target function
- Added SingleFileApplication and InvalidTarget imports
setup.py - Updated Python version requirement
- Modified dependency groups
- Added new cli-full extra
tests/test_cli.py - Added sfa_services_valid for parameterized testing
- Reduced test rerun attempts

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant CLI as Responder CLI
    participant SFA as SingleFileApplication
    participant App as Application
    
    CLI->>SFA: load_target(target)
    SFA-->>CLI: Validate and load target
    SFA->>App: Initialize application
    CLI->>App: Run application
Loading

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Responder's New Groove 🚀

From Python 3.6 to 3.7 we leap,
CLI commands now broader and deep,
Remote files and local, all within reach,
Extensions now neatly tucked, each in its niche,
Responder evolves with a technological peep!

🌈✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d4532a and ce60ef2.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • .github/workflows/test.yaml is excluded by !**/*.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/cli.rst (2 hunks)
  • docs/source/conf.py (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/index.rst (1 hunks)
  • responder/api.py (1 hunks)
  • responder/util/python.py (3 hunks)
  • setup.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/test_cli.py (1 hunks)

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@amotl amotl changed the title Use pueblo.sfa for responder run CLI 2025: Use pueblo.sfa for responder run Jan 18, 2025
Base automatically changed from bring-back-cli to main January 18, 2025 21:22
@amotl amotl force-pushed the sfa branch 5 times, most recently from b1cb1e2 to 7be9bc8 Compare January 18, 2025 23:40
@amotl amotl force-pushed the sfa branch 2 times, most recently from d853904 to 139b7e9 Compare January 18, 2025 23:57
@amotl amotl marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2025 04:02
@amotl amotl merged commit 2278beb into main Jan 19, 2025
31 of 32 checks passed
@amotl amotl deleted the sfa branch January 19, 2025 04:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant