VACMS 16962 Adds back to top to Billing and Insurance pages

[eselkin]

Summary

• Adds va-back-to-top to Billing and Insurance top-task page
• Sitewide Facilities

Related issue(s)

• VAMC Billing & Insurance: adopt V1 and V3 components where components are not used va.gov-cms#16962

Testing done

• Manual check that DS component appears. Tested that component brings user back to top content on page in mobile and desktop.

Screenshots

Note: This field is mandatory for UI changes (non-component work should NOT have screenshots).

Desktop page

Mobile page

What areas of the site does it impact?

Billing and Insurance VAMC top-task pages

Acceptance criteria

• VA back-to-top component appears

Quality Assurance & Testing

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Linting warnings have been addressed
• Documentation has been updated (link to documentation *if necessary)
• Screenshot of the developed feature is added
• Accessibility testing has been performed

Error Handling

• Browser console contains no warnings or errors.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)

Authentication

• Did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected with a test user (does not affect authenticated content)

Requested Feedback

See that component appears either in images or on RI

[eselkin]

If you look at the desktop image, you'll see the spacing between the back to top and the Medallia button is larger (like it was in one of the PW fixes to this issue). Do we put the feedback button into the article like it is in the one that was cited here?

Most pages have the spacing like this one as opposed to the one in the comment above.
@thejordanwood @laflannery

[eselkin]

I moved it, will update the image

[eselkin]

Image is updated

[thejordanwood]

Thanks @eselkin! The spacing looks good to me.