Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DESENG-496: Fixed Comments cannot be approved #2398

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

ratheesh-aot
Copy link
Collaborator

Added missing transactional decorator

Issue #: https://apps.itsm.gov.bc.ca/jira/browse/DESENG-496

Description of changes:
Fixed by adding a missing decorator for transactional methods.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the met-public license (Apache 2.0).

Added missing transactional decorator
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.15%. Comparing base (05be8f3) to head (7c23bfc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2398   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.15%   74.15%           
=======================================
  Files         529      529           
  Lines       18045    18046    +1     
  Branches     1344     1344           
=======================================
+ Hits        13381    13382    +1     
  Misses       4455     4455           
  Partials      209      209           
Flag Coverage Δ
metapi 85.66% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
met-api/src/met_api/services/submission_service.py 74.15% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

@ratheesh-aot ratheesh-aot merged commit d3440c1 into bcgov:main Feb 28, 2024
9 checks passed
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants