-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[GEN-1313] Export detailed columns for NAACCR codes #567
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f1f8f92
export detailed columns for NAACCR codes
danlu1 f6eb440
replace hard code dataframe synid with genie_config
danlu1 3cac57e
replace hard code table synid
danlu1 91ef469
update unit test
danlu1 c93116e
remove Project GENIE data analysis group since it no longer exists
danlu1 39fcdbd
replace hard code in public release code
danlu1 a4578ee
reformat genie/consortium_to_public.py
danlu1 d1b472d
add clinical_tier_release_scope table synid to genie_config
danlu1 bc6b684
add more tests to the unit test
danlu1 6de52e5
Merge branch 'develop' into GEN-1313-create-naaccr-codes
danlu1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danlu1 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a comment. Nothing actionable here. I think it's OK we don't have unit tests for these giant functions:
stagingToCbio
,store_clinical_files
andconsortiumToPublic
in thedatabase_to_staging
andconsortium_to_public
code just because these are better tested using integration tests and we already did that with our pipeline comparisons and our test runs on the test pipeline.Doing this would be outside the scope of this ticket and is already part of our tech debt epic to refactor and add tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I agree that we add unit tests later for these functions for our tech debt epic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The more we can spin out "unit functions" within these larger functions, the more they will be better served as integration tests.
If we think of these as ETL, it should tell the story of data processing.