Update pull-request.yml to Auto-Commit Changes in pubspec.lock

[may-tas]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• updated pull-request.yml workflow file by adding a step to commit any uncommitted changes in pubspec.lock automatically.

Issue Number:

• Fixes Update push.yml to java-version: "17.0" #2679

Did you add tests for your changes?

• Not Required

Snapshots/Videos:

Summary

• This PR resolves the issue caused by uncommitted changes in pubspec.lock that prevent branch switching. It ensures the file is committed, allowing smooth transitions between branches without conflicts

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• No

Checklist for Repository Standards

• Have you reviewed and implemented all applicable coderaabbitai review suggestions?
• Have you ensured that the PR aligns with the repository’s contribution guidelines?

Have you read the contributing guide?

• Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration
  • Added automatic handling of pubspec.lock file changes
  • Enhanced workflow permissions and authentication

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow file pull-request.yml. The changes focus on enhancing the handling of pubspec.lock file updates during the CI process. A new workflow step is introduced to automatically commit and push changes to the pubspec.lock file when detected. The workflow now includes explicit permissions for content access and uses GitHub token authentication. The stashing of pubspec.lock changes has been removed from the existing workflow steps.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml	- Added permissions section with write access to contents - Updated checkout step with GitHub token - Added new step to detect and commit pubspec.lock changes - Removed stashing of pubspec.lock in existing steps

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Update Java version	❌	No changes related to Java version in this PR

Possibly related PRs

• Update push.yml to Auto-Commit Changes in pubspec.lock #2701: Similar changes involving automatic commits for pubspec.lock and workflow permissions

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In workflows where changes flow,
Pubspec locks now dance and grow
With tokens bright and commits clean
Our GitHub action's magic scene!
Automation's rabbit hops with glee 🚀

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ce1e6d and 8f0cc6e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

50-50: "github.head_ref" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Checking codebase

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)

25-26: LGTM! Properly configured permissions and authentication.

The permissions are correctly scoped to only what's needed (contents:write) and the GitHub token is properly referenced.

Also applies to: 33-33

[palisadoes]

See comment

[palisadoes]

Please make Code Rabbit approve your changes

[may-tas]

@palisadoes
I'll follow CodeRabbit suggestions but its also saying to remove -a flag.
What should be done?

[palisadoes]

CodeRabbit is wrong in that case

[may-tas]

CodeRabbit is wrong in that case

Got it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.55%. Comparing base (5ce1e6d) to head (bc8169d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #2707   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             96.55%   96.55%           
=================================================
  Files                   189      189           
  Lines                  9994     9994           
=================================================
  Hits                   9650     9650           
  Misses                  344      344           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f0cc6e and bc8169d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml

[error] 58-58: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Checking codebase

🔇 Additional comments (2)

.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)

25-26: LGTM! Appropriate permissions for auto-commit functionality.

The contents: write permission is correctly specified for pushing changes to the repository.

---

33-33: LGTM! Proper token configuration for authentication.

Using secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN is the recommended approach for authentication in GitHub Actions.

[may-tas]

@palisadoes Please review and tell me if any more changes are required.