-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 498
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added Auto docs using Github Action #2713
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hars-21 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow and documentation configuration. A new job Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
Other🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
143-151
: Fix shell script quoting in documentation checkThe script has potential word splitting issues as flagged by shellcheck.
Add proper quoting:
- name: Check for Doc Updates id: DocUpdated run: | - if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain docs/docs/auto-docs)" ]; then + if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain "docs/docs/auto-docs")" ]; then echo "updateDoc=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT echo "Documentation has been updated!" else echo "No documentation updates found." fi🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
154-161
: Improve documentation commit processThe current implementation might create empty commits or fail if there are no changes.
Add better error handling and commit message:
- name: Commit and Push Docs if: steps.DocUpdated.outputs.updateDoc run: | git config user.name "${{ github.actor }}" git config user.email "${{ github.actor }}@users.noreply.github.com" - git add docs/docs/auto-docs - git commit -m "Update auto-generated documentation" - git push + git add "docs/docs/auto-docs" + git commit -m "docs: update auto-generated documentation [skip ci] + + - Updated Dart/Flutter documentation + - Updated Java documentation + + Co-authored-by: ${{ github.actor }} <${{ github.actor }}@users.noreply.github.com>" + git push || echo "::error::Failed to push documentation updates"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(4 hunks)docs/package.json
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
109-109: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
145-145: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Checking codebase
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
108-111
:⚠️ Potential issueUpdate actions/setup-java to latest version
The current version is outdated and may have security vulnerabilities.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
108-108: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
126-135
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove Dart documentation generation
The implementation needs optimization for better efficiency and configuration.
136-140
:⚠️ Potential issueFix Java documentation generation
The command needs to be updated to match the project structure.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
152-160
: Enhance commit message and add error handlingThe commit message could be more descriptive, and the push operation needs error handling.
Apply these improvements:
- name: Commit and Push Docs if: steps.DocUpdated.outputs.updateDoc run: | git config user.name "${{ github.actor }}" git config user.email "${{ github.actor }}@users.noreply.github.com" git add docs/docs/auto-docs - git commit -m "Update auto-generated documentation" - git push + git commit -m "docs: update auto-generated documentation for Dart, Flutter, and Java [skip ci]" + if ! git push; then + echo "Failed to push changes. Retrying with pull and rebase..." + git pull --rebase + git push + fi
308-308
: Improve job condition precisionThe current condition could be more specific about the branch requirements.
Update the condition:
- if: ${{ github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' && github.event.pull_request.base.ref == 'develop-postgres' }} + if: | + github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' && + github.event.pull_request.base.ref == 'develop-postgres' && + !contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'skip-docs')
314-323
: Add caching for Node.js dependenciesAdding cache for node_modules will improve workflow execution time.
Add caching step:
- name: Set up Node.js uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: "20.x" + cache: 'npm' + cache-dependency-path: './docs/package-lock.json' +- name: Cache node_modules + uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ./docs/node_modules + key: ${{ runner.os }}-node-${{ hashFiles('./docs/package-lock.json') }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-node- - name: Install dependencies working-directory: ./docs run: npm install
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
108-108: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
144-144: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Checking codebase
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
40-40
: Verify Flutter version compatibilityThe Flutter version has been updated to 3.22.3, which is a very recent release. Please ensure that all dependencies and plugins are compatible with this version.
Run this script to check for potential compatibility issues:
✅ Verification successful
Flutter version 3.22.3 is compatible with project configuration
The Flutter SDK version 3.22.3 is compatible with:
- Project's SDK constraints (
>=2.17.0 <=3.4.4
)- All current package dependencies using flexible version constraints
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Flutter dependencies compatibility with version 3.22.3 # Get all pubspec.yaml files fd pubspec.yaml --type f --exec sh -c ' echo "Checking dependencies in {}" grep "^[[:space:]]*flutter:" -A 5 {} || true echo "---" 'Length of output: 496
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get complete dependency information including SDK constraints echo "=== Main pubspec.yaml ===" cat pubspec.yaml | grep -A 2 "sdk:" echo -e "\n=== Checking for Flutter version constraints in all YAML files ===" rg "sdk: flutter|flutter_version|flutter.*version" -A 2 -g "*.yaml" -g "*.yml"Length of output: 911
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2713 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 96.55% 96.55%
=================================================
Files 189 189
Lines 9994 9994
=================================================
Hits 9650 9650
Misses 344 344 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sorry Sir I will improve the script and will make a new PR once done. Sorry for the inconvenience. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #2678
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Docs can be found here: /docs/docs/auto-docs
Summary
Added auto generated docs for talawa-mobile docs
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist for Repository Standards
coderaabbitai
review suggestions?Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Workflow Updates
Documentation