Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bug fix for float in historical data #641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

grzesir
Copy link
Contributor

@grzesir grzesir commented Nov 29, 2024

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Implement type-checking for the length parameter in the get_historical_prices function to ensure it is an integer, and update the package version in setup.py from 3.8.14 to 3.8.15.

Why are these changes being made?

The update addresses a bug where non-integer values for the length parameter in historical data retrieval could cause unexpected behavior, improving robustness by attempting to cast it to an integer and raising a meaningful error if casting fails. Incrementing the version number reflects this bug fix, improving package maintainability and version tracking.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Copy link
Contributor

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary by Korbit AI

Code Health Comments

  • Log the original exception to preserve error information for debugging before raising a new ValueError.
Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
setup.py
lumibot/data_sources/pandas_data.py
lumibot/entities/data.py
lumibot/strategies/strategy.py

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Comment on lines +3104 to +3108
except Exception as e:
raise ValueError(
f"Invalid length parameter in get_historical_prices() method. Length must be an int but instead got {length}, "
f"which is a type {type(length)}."
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

category Error Handling severity potentially major

Log the original exception before raising a new one.

Tell me more

Consider logging the original exception before raising a new one. This can help with debugging by preserving the original error information. You could add a log statement before raising the ValueError.

Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 30, 2024 via email

Copy link
Contributor

korbit-ai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

@Syntax-Sorcerer87 I am looking at your pull request. The description will be updated shortly. In the meantime, please do not edit the description until I have finished writing mine.

Copy link
Contributor

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary by Korbit AI

Code Health Comments

  • Log the original exception before raising a new one to improve debugging and error context.
Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
setup.py
lumibot/data_sources/pandas_data.py
lumibot/entities/data.py
lumibot/strategies/strategy.py

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions
Issue Categories
Category Enabled
Naming
Database Operations
Documentation
Logging
Error Handling
Systems and Environment
Objects and Data Structures
Readability and Maintainability
Asynchronous Processing
Design Patterns
Third-Party Libraries
Performance
Security
Functionality

Feedback and Support

Comment on lines +3104 to +3108
except Exception as e:
raise ValueError(
f"Invalid length parameter in get_historical_prices() method. Length must be an int but instead got {length}, "
f"which is a type {type(length)}."
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

category Error Handling severity potentially major

Log exceptions before raising a new one.

Tell me more

When catching an exception, it's a good practice to log the error before raising a new exception. This helps with debugging by providing more context about the original error. Consider logging the original exception before raising the ValueError.

Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.

@grzesir grzesir merged commit b295196 into dev Dec 3, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant