Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update for KNITRO.jl v0.14.0 #117

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Contributor

@odow odow commented Nov 28, 2023

I've been simplifying the C API to KNITRO.jl: jump-dev/KNITRO.jl#267. The main change is to align everything with the underlying C API of Knitro and removing the Julia-specific functions.

The downside is that it introduces a few breaking changes. This PR fixes the tests.

@amontoison
Copy link
Member

Thanks Oscar! I will merge it when the version 0.14 of KNITRO.jl will be released.

@odow odow closed this Nov 29, 2023
@odow odow reopened this Nov 29, 2023
@odow
Copy link
Contributor Author

odow commented Nov 29, 2023

Can you re-start CI? IT should work now

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1603907) 77.73% compared to head (5332764) 76.30%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/api.jl 65.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
src/nls.jl 62.50% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/nlp.jl 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #117      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.73%   76.30%   -1.43%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines         265      287      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits          206      219      +13     
- Misses         59       68       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@odow
Copy link
Contributor Author

odow commented Nov 29, 2023

How do these tests run if you have the license in the other PR?

@odow
Copy link
Contributor Author

odow commented Nov 29, 2023

Nice nice nice. This seems like the tests are passing with the new version.

@amontoison
Copy link
Member

amontoison commented Nov 29, 2023

How do these tests run if you have the license in the other PR?

We also have self-hosted builds with a dedicated KNITRO licence for the cluster.
I asked another licence last month just for CI because it's easier for installing a more recent KNITRO version.

@amontoison amontoison merged commit b044be8 into JuliaSmoothOptimizers:main Nov 29, 2023
6 of 12 checks passed
@odow odow deleted the od/knitro branch November 29, 2023 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants