-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci(solidity): trigger only on path #448
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@fbac has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow configuration for Solidity by changing the trigger conditions. Instead of triggering on pushes to the Changes
Suggested Reviewers
Possibly Related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/solidity.yml (1)
5-7
: LGTM! Path-based triggering improves CI efficiency.The addition of path filters for push events is well-implemented:
- Matches the existing pull_request trigger paths for consistency
- Correctly includes both contract files and the workflow itself
- Will reduce unnecessary CI runs by only triggering on relevant changes
This change will improve CI efficiency by:
- Reducing resource usage
- Decreasing pipeline queue times
- Focusing builds on relevant changes only
09ae609
to
693bf29
Compare
693bf29
to
bf91423
Compare
Solidity CI was triggering when PR are pushed to main.
Summary by CodeRabbit