-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
timestamp: Redefine timestamp in Data delivery #274
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rakuco
reviewed
Jun 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Mandy <[email protected]>
rakuco
reviewed
Jun 7, 2024
rakuco
reviewed
Jun 7, 2024
rakuco
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
rakuco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
Follow-up to #274, related to #257. The wording used in #274, which mentions platform-specific timestamps, made more sense in the context of the Generic Sensor API spec, as multiple platform-specific sensor APIs provide samples with timestamps in a platform-specific format that needs to be converted. Of the OS-provided telemetry APIs, however, only Windows optionally provides samples with a timestamp. As such, it makes more sense to define a timestamp using the monotonic clock's unsafe current time instead. Aditionally, the accompanying note was rewritten to indicate that the same value should be used for all globals, otherwise the same sample would end up with different "raw" timestamps in different frames/workers.
rakuco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
…eck (#279) Follow-up to #274, related to #257. The call to the "passes rate test" algorithm should use `timeValue` rather than `timestamp`: the former is what is stored in `PressureRecord.[[Time]]`, so it makes sense to compare values that have been similarly coarsened and converted to a relative time.
rakuco
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
Follow-up to #274, related to #257. The wording used in #274, which mentions platform-specific timestamps, made more sense in the context of the Generic Sensor API spec, as multiple platform-specific sensor APIs provide samples with timestamps in a platform-specific format that needs to be converted. Of the OS-provided telemetry APIs, however, only Windows optionally provides samples with a timestamp. As such, it makes more sense to define a timestamp using the monotonic clock's unsafe current time instead. Aditionally, the accompanying note was rewritten to indicate that the same value should be used for all globals, otherwise the same sample would end up with different "raw" timestamps in different frames/workers.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #257
Preview | Diff