Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency stylelint to v16 #132

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 29, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
stylelint (source) 15.11.0 -> 16.1.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

stylelint/stylelint (stylelint)

v16.1.0

Compare Source

v16.0.2

Compare Source

v16.0.1

Compare Source

v16.0.0

Compare Source

Migrating to 16.0.0 guide.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on Thursday on the first day instance of January, March, May, July, September, November after 4pm" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-16.x branch 2 times, most recently from cf2e562 to bb16989 Compare December 29, 2023 13:22
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/stylelint-16.x branch from bb16989 to 88b1cb6 Compare December 29, 2023 13:24
@ProchaLu ProchaLu merged commit 16b032e into main Dec 29, 2023
3 checks passed
@ProchaLu ProchaLu deleted the renovate/stylelint-16.x branch December 29, 2023 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant