Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CorrelationRecorder v3.0 #677

Merged

Conversation

Baraujo25
Copy link
Contributor

@Baraujo25 Baraujo25 commented Oct 1, 2024

Auto Correlation Recorder Plugin v3.0 Release Note

We're excited to bring you the latest enhancements and features in the Auto Correlation Recorder Plugin v3.0
Here's what's new:

Siebel removed from core

The following components were removed from the plugin

  • Siebel Array JMeter Function
  • Siebel Counter Correlation Replacement
  • Siebel Row Correlation Extractor
  • Siebel Row Id Correlation Replacement
  • Siebel Row Params Correlation Replacement
    The main reason this release is major one is due to the lack of backward compatibility.

However, not all are bad news. Now it's possible to access to a better Siebel correlation support by joining the Blazemeter community.
It's possible to use the new template and components directly from the plugin!

Other Improvements

  • Fix issue which reseted the JMeter templates.xml
  • Allow to display templates description that contain custom rules despite of jar installation
  • Dynamic class loader for custom extractors and replacements
  • Custom extensions are now saved in lib/ext to benefit from JMeter class loading system
  • Fix several issues related to apply suggestions based on a template

@undera
Copy link
Owner

undera commented Oct 1, 2024

Is this PR a draft, still?

@Baraujo25
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's ready! We use it draft as a staging area just in case the release automation brakes something in the way..

@Baraujo25 Baraujo25 marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2024 16:56
@undera undera merged commit 9be093b into undera:master Oct 1, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants