Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch default for foreach_point_neighbor #687

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

svchb
Copy link
Collaborator

@svchb svchb commented Dec 17, 2024

Using each_moving_particle as default leads to hard to debug issues especially in multi system simulations.

@svchb svchb self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@svchb svchb requested review from efaulhaber and LasNikas December 17, 2024 15:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.73%. Comparing base (259ba31) to head (0c7cee4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #687      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.77%   68.73%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          93       93              
  Lines        5780     5780              
==========================================
- Hits         3975     3973       -2     
- Misses       1805     1807       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 68.73% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@efaulhaber efaulhaber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please also remove points=eachparticle(system) for the corrections and the boundary stuff, since it's the default now?

@svchb svchb requested a review from efaulhaber January 20, 2025 15:18
Copy link
Member

@efaulhaber efaulhaber left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! @LasNikas you should probably have a closer look to make sure this doesn't cause any problems with buffers and active/inactive particles.

Copy link
Collaborator

@LasNikas LasNikas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@efaulhaber efaulhaber closed this Jan 23, 2025
@efaulhaber efaulhaber reopened this Jan 23, 2025
@efaulhaber efaulhaber enabled auto-merge (squash) January 23, 2025 10:57
@efaulhaber efaulhaber merged commit 37b695e into trixi-framework:main Jan 23, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants