Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed explicit mode for multi-lora #45

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

oandreeva-nv
Copy link
Contributor

explicit model load was causing failures in tests with vllm==v0.5.0.post1

@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ def _test_vllm_model(
self.triton_client.stop_stream()

def test_multi_lora_requests(self):
self.triton_client.load_model(self.vllm_model_name)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we know why it doesn't work with explicit mode?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Due to the way vllm evaluates free GPU memory. I'm not sure what exactly changed, but in explicit mode initialize fails at:

 Error in memory profiling. This happens when the GPU memory was not properly cleaned up before initializing the vLLM instance.

Unfortunately, I don't have the capacity to investigate what exactly changed in the profiling

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sample job failure: 98632142

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@oandreeva-nv Have you created ticket for further investigation?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DLIS-7012

@oandreeva-nv oandreeva-nv requested a review from Tabrizian July 3, 2024 16:06
@oandreeva-nv oandreeva-nv merged commit db3d794 into main Jul 5, 2024
3 checks passed
@oandreeva-nv oandreeva-nv deleted the oandreeva_post_050_updates branch July 5, 2024 22:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants