Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Part of claim 2 #11

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

Part of claim 2 #11

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

metakunt
Copy link
Collaborator

I have added parts of claim 2 to the database. I have found the following theorem which shall be useful to us.
https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/fta1g.html

Essentially, given a set A and a non-zero polynomial P if every element of A is a root of P, then the degree of P is an upper bound of the size of A.

Thus it appears that we have to show that the algebraic closure of Galois fields are integral domains. We likely will need to show that they are fields anyway, so we are able to apply the lemma above.

I am not quite sure how far we need to have Galois closures and even if we need them. What do you think about it?

@metakunt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also this corresponds to https://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/manindra/algebra/primality_v6.pdf Lemma 4.8 which is much cleaner written.

@metakunt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think this reduces the computation in $$F_p$$ to the computation in $$\mathbb{Z}_p/(X^r-1)$$ and we may have more tools here already.

@tirix tirix merged commit 0e32fdb into master Aug 27, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants