overhaul of the parser #995
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
:) |
8 tasks
|
Does this need redoing for the current dev branch? |
|
i don't think so, it was merged before |
|
i have had some plans to do an overhaul again, possibly switching to a parser generator. will take some time though |
|
Ok I'll mark as done on #1076 for now |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
i kind of messed up when trying to update my last PR, sorry about that (still trying to figure out how to do this github thing)
it's the same code as before, so still needs some choices where to be more liberal with whitespace and where to be more strict.
as has been suggested i might also try out mega-parsec in the future