Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Providing Ludwigshafen besides Mannheim for NDC 621 #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion REPORTED_ISSUES.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,4 +40,10 @@ However, we have provided a [test case to verify if the labels are corrected](ht

Although the Smart Speaker has been retired, we identified other projects that could benefit from the wrapper and open-sourced it on May 3rd, 2023.
While we are currently maintaining the basic implementation, the previous discussion is catching up to question if we should extend the knowledge of the German Number plan to other functions as validating.
When we have further insights, we will report them as issues, re-engage with Google, and list the new issues in this file.
When we have further insights, we will report them as issues, re-engage with Google, and list the new issues in this file.

### 2024-05-04 - [GeoCoder labels German shared NDC 212(9) correctly but not 621(x)(y)](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341)

BnetzA [described special case for NDC 212 and 621](https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Nummerierung/Rufnummern/ONVerzeichnisse/ONBVerzeichnis/Sonderregelungen0212_0621.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1) the first one is correctly recognized by geocoder and the two cities are correctly labeled. But the second case is not recognized and only the city Mannheim is used for labeling and not Ludwigshafen.

We have provided Ludwighafen in our labeling data.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pom.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
<artifactId>normalizer</artifactId>
<name>Phonenumber Normalizer</name>
<description>Library to work with phonenumbers, especially to fix googles PhoneLib ignoring German Landline specifics.</description>
<version>1.1.25-SNAPSHOT</version>
<version>1.2.0</version>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<url>https://github.com/telekom/phonenumber-normalizer</url>

Expand Down
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions src/main/resources/arealabels/nationallabels/de.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3243,6 +3243,11 @@
"6207": "Wald Michelbach",
"6209": "Mörlenbach",
"621": "Mannheim",
"6215": "Ludwigshafen",
"6216": "Ludwigshafen",
"62195": "Ludwigshafen",
"62196": "Ludwigshafen",
"62199": "Ludwigshafen",
"6220": "Wilhelmsfeld",
"6221": "Heidelberg",
"6222": "Wiesloch",
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ class PhoneAreaCodeComponentImplTest extends Specification {
"201" | "DE" | "Essen"
"202" | "DE" | "Wuppertal"
"6041" | "DE" | "Bottrop"
"60411" | "DE" | "Bottrop"
"60412" | "DE" | "XXX"
"60413" | "DE" | "Bottrop"
"205" | "US" | "Alabama"
"659" | "US" | "Alabama"
"203" | "US" | "Connecticut"
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3307,7 +3307,13 @@ class PhoneNumberOfflineGeocoderTest extends Specification {
"6206" | "Lampertheim" | false
"6207" | "Wald Michelbach" | false
"6209" | "Mörlenbach" | false
"621" | "Mannheim" | false
"621" | "Mannheim" | false // main BnetzA number plan - but shared with Ludwigshafen
// note of BnetzA, that starting number is sperating both cities: see https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Nummerierung/Rufnummern/ONVerzeichnisse/ONBVerzeichnis/Sonderregelungen0212_0621.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1
"6215" | "Ludwigshafen" | true // see https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341
"6216" | "Ludwigshafen" | true // see https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341
"62195" | "Ludwigshafen" | true // see https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341
"62196" | "Ludwigshafen" | true // see https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341
"62199" | "Ludwigshafen" | true // see https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/338710341
"6220" | "Wilhelmsfeld" | false
"6221" | "Heidelberg" | false
"6222" | "Wiesloch" | false
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion src/test/resources/arealabels/nationallabels/de.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
"201": "Essen",
"202": "Wuppertal",
"603": "Duisburg",
"6041": "Bottrop"
"6041": "Bottrop",
"60412": "XXX"
}
]
Loading