chore: events tracking for settings changes #1523
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes update the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src-tauri/src/commands.rs (3)
514-514: Consider enhancing the logging pattern for better observability.While the current logging implementation is good, consider these improvements:
- Use structured logging for better parsing:
-info!(target: LOG_TARGET, "[set_mode] called with mode: {:?}, custom_max_cpu_usage: {:?}, custom_max_gpu_usage: {:?}", mode, custom_cpu_usage, custom_gpu_usage); +info!(target: LOG_TARGET, command = "set_mode", mode = ?mode, custom_cpu_usage = ?custom_cpu_usage, custom_gpu_usage = ?custom_gpu_usage);
- Consider masking sensitive data in logs (e.g., addresses, tokens)
Also applies to: 740-740, 900-900, 934-934, 951-951, 973-973, 1020-1020, 1041-1041, 1057-1057, 1080-1080, 1105-1105, 1146-1146, 1168-1168, 1249-1249, 1283-1283, 1303-1303, 1336-1336, 1412-1412, 1744-1744
900-910: Standardize error handling across settings commands.Some functions use
inspect_errfor error logging while others don't. Consider standardizing the error handling pattern across all settings commands:- state - .config - .write() - .await - .set_application_language(application_language.clone()) - .await - .map_err(|e| e.to_string())?; + state + .config + .write() + .await + .set_application_language(application_language.clone()) + .await + .inspect_err(|e| error!(target: LOG_TARGET, "error at set_application_language {:?}", e)) + .map_err(|e| e.to_string())?;Also applies to: 934-943, 1020-1034, 1057-1072, 1168-1211
62-62: Consider extracting performance monitoring into a reusable pattern.The current approach of manually timing each function and logging when it exceeds
MAX_ACCEPTABLE_COMMAND_TIMEleads to code duplication. Consider creating a wrapper or decorator:async fn with_performance_monitoring<F, T, E>(name: &str, f: F) -> Result<T, E> where F: Future<Output = Result<T, E>>, E: ToString, { let timer = Instant::now(); let result = f.await; if timer.elapsed() > MAX_ACCEPTABLE_COMMAND_TIME { warn!(target: LOG_TARGET, "{} took too long: {:?}", name, timer.elapsed()); } result } // Usage: #[tauri::command] pub async fn set_mode(...) -> Result<(), String> { with_performance_monitoring("set_mode", async { // Original function body }).await }Also applies to: 950-965, 1015-1034, 1079-1095
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src-tauri/src/commands.rs(19 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: tauri-build
- GitHub Check: cargo checks (fmt, clippy, check)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src-tauri/src/commands.rs (2)
514-514: LGTM! Consistent logging pattern for settings changes.The changes add consistent logging statements across all settings-related commands, which aligns well with the PR objective of implementing events tracking for settings changes. Each log entry follows a clear pattern:
- Uses the
info!macro for consistent log level- Includes the function name in square brackets
- Logs the input parameters
Also applies to: 740-740, 900-900, 934-934, 951-951, 973-973, 1020-1020, 1041-1041, 1057-1057, 1080-1080, 1105-1105, 1146-1146, 1168-1168, 1249-1249, 1283-1283, 1303-1303, 1336-1336, 1412-1412, 1744-1744
934-943:❓ Verification inconclusive
Review lock acquisition patterns to prevent potential deadlocks.
Several settings commands acquire multiple locks (e.g., config write lock, manager locks). Consider:
- Documenting the lock order to prevent deadlocks
- Using structured concurrency patterns
- Implementing timeouts for lock acquisitions
Run this script to analyze the lock acquisition patterns:
Also applies to: 1057-1072, 1168-1211
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Find all lock acquisitions in the codebase rg -A 2 '(read|write)\(\)\.await'Length of output: 27263
Concurrency Lock Order Concerns – Please Verify Documentation and Patterns
The grep results confirm that many parts of the codebase (including in commands, node manager, telemetry, etc.) acquire asynchronous read/write locks. In particular, in the snippet in src-tauri/src/commands.rs (lines 934–943) and other areas (e.g., lines 1057–1072, 1168–1211), locks are acquired that could potentially interact in a way that leads to deadlocks if not managed carefully.
Recommendations:
- Document the Lock Order: Ensure that the order in which locks are acquired (e.g., config write locks, manager locks) is clearly documented across components.
- Structured Concurrency: Consider refactoring functions to use structured concurrency patterns to avoid nested and overlapping locks.
- Lock Timeouts: Evaluate introducing timeouts for lock acquisition to prevent prolonged waiting that might escalate into deadlock scenarios.
Please verify that these practices are applied consistently across the codebase to mitigate any potential risk of deadlocks in concurrent operations.
|
Sorry, my mistake on a vague description. The events should be sent by telemetry so we can track the usage of features externally. |
#1471
Description
Summary by CodeRabbit