Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update to deployer functions for AddOnDeploymentConfig and ClusterManagementAddOn #1592

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor

@JoaoBraveCoding JoaoBraveCoding commented Aug 27, 2024

In #1470 we added support for deploying and configuring MCOA with the capabilities field. However, if we enabled a field in capabilities and then disabled it MCO would not reconcile the AddOnDeploymentConfig correctly due to DeepDerivative, which would return true instead of false.

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

ClusterManagementAddOn

In
stolostron#1470
we added support for deploying and configuring MCOA with the
capabilities field. However if we enabled a field in capabilities and
then disable it MCO would not reconcile the AddOnDeploymentConfig
correctly due to DeepDerivative, that would return true instead of
false.

Signed-off-by: Joao Marcal <[email protected]>
@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

@philipgough philipgough left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

3 similar comments
@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Sep 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 6, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 6, 2024

/retest

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 6, 2024

/retest

2 similar comments
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 7, 2024

/retest

@JoaoBraveCoding
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Copy link
Contributor

@periklis periklis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoaoBraveCoding, periklis, philipgough

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JoaoBraveCoding,periklis,philipgough]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@periklis
Copy link
Contributor

periklis commented Sep 9, 2024

/retest

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 2c316bf into stolostron:main Sep 9, 2024
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants