-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
blocks-import-script: add --markdown flag and remove --csv-output flag #2985
Conversation
|
bb00e61
to
3a3eb26
Compare
In python : The brackets
|
my preference would broadly be that we cut down on the output formats to as few as possible - ie either csv or markdown - there's no point maintaining a bunch of formats that don't get used. |
I like |
whatever is minimally legible .. I'd even be fine with dumping the regular text output into triple-quotes or a table or a csv or any variation thereof. It doesn't greatly matter as long as it doesn't require multiple clicks to get to. The fewer the clicks and scrolling the better. In terms of importance, I think the "main" readme that lists all benchmarks in a big table is the most important one - this is where we can get a quick overview whether a particular commit slowed something down. Having to drill down into each folder takes ages. |
You can keep CSV and then just use a converter tool - one of many, like csv2md - and just convert it afterwards. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The markdown formatting code could use refactoring but it's good enough for now.
6d5cf8e
to
df119a9
Compare
df119a9
to
730f649
Compare
Summary
This PR adds
--markdown-output
support to blocks import script.This PR also removes
--csv-output
flag.This option can be used like this
The output is a nice markdown table :
blocks-import-benchmark.csv vs blocks-import-benchmark.csv
Summary
Legend
(+) = more is better, (-) = less is better