Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/assignment builder 1 #209

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Sep 10, 2015

Conversation

annagav
Copy link
Contributor

@annagav annagav commented May 28, 2015

Ivan's Assignment Builder.

@pdpinch
Copy link
Contributor

pdpinch commented May 29, 2015

Just a thought: would it make it easier for review to break up Ivan's commits?


from instructor.compiler import *

print preview_as_json(1L)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's this?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, remove this please. And I made it to the bottom of my first read through!!!! Yay!

@annagav annagav force-pushed the feature/assignment_builder_1 branch from 903ee9e to d8db895 Compare September 9, 2015 20:52
@annagav
Copy link
Contributor Author

annagav commented Sep 9, 2015

Should be ready for review now!

@pdpinch pdpinch added this to the Assignment Builder milestone Sep 10, 2015
@pdpinch
Copy link
Contributor

pdpinch commented Sep 10, 2015

I think this is as good as it's going to get. Do you think we should squash the commits? Ivan's commit history isn't terribly enlightening, but it's something.

Your call -- you can merge after you squash or not.

annagav added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2015
@annagav annagav merged commit f410650 into starteam:develop Sep 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants