Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed some incorrect labels and added some e2e. #3086

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

ty-dc
Copy link
Collaborator

@ty-dc ty-dc commented Jan 14, 2024

Thanks for contributing!

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d990b82) 81.05% compared to head (9650ca2) 81.05%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3086   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.05%   81.05%           
=======================================
  Files          49       49           
  Lines        5351     5351           
=======================================
  Hits         4337     4337           
  Misses        856      856           
  Partials      158      158           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 81.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@ty-dc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ty-dc commented Jan 15, 2024

/hold rebase #3088

@ty-dc ty-dc force-pushed the e2e/new-7 branch 2 times, most recently from 00ae022 to fe60e82 Compare January 15, 2024 06:06
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ jobs:
echo "The current kubernetes version is ${{ inputs.k8s_version }} , ignore to install openvswitch due to Kind base image outdated"
INSTALL_OVS_VALUE=false;
fi
echo "INSTALL_OVS=${INSTALL_OVS_VALUE}" >> $GITHUB_ENV
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no need

@@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ jobs:
make ${{ matrix.e2e_test_mode }} -e E2E_CLUSTER_NAME=${{ env.E2E_CLUSTER_NAME }} \
-e E2E_GINKGO_LABELS=${E2E_LABELS} \
-e E2E_TIMEOUT=${{ env.E2E_TIME_OUT }} \
-e INSTALL_OVS=${{ env.INSTALL_OVS }} \
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use the E2E codes to check whether we have ovs SMC or IPPool resource

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ty-dc ty-dc Jan 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't need ovs, I just need to confirm that the node has an additional NIC for NIC abnormality testing, such as eth1.

But you're right, I shouldn't judge in CI, put it in It.

@Icarus9913 Icarus9913 merged commit 092494a into spidernet-io:main Jan 16, 2024
42 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants