Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test get_data when changing a subsets label #2609

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

javerbukh
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request adds a test that makes sure renaming a subset does not change the result of a get_data call.

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

@javerbukh javerbukh modified the milestones: 3.8.1, 3.9 Dec 12, 2023
@pllim
Copy link
Contributor

pllim commented Dec 13, 2023

What if you change the subset name to be the same as data name? Will the app get confused?

@javerbukh
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pllim Added that case to the test and it still retrieves the data with the subset applied as expected.

jdaviz/tests/test_subsets.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 11 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0673de8) 91.54% compared to head (0eab900) 91.53%.
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
jdaviz/core/template_mixin.py 93.16% 8 Missing ⚠️
...igs/specviz/plugins/line_analysis/line_analysis.py 87.50% 2 Missing ⚠️
...configs/cubeviz/plugins/moment_maps/moment_maps.py 95.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2609      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.54%   91.53%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       19757    19944     +187     
==========================================
+ Hits        18086    18255     +169     
- Misses       1671     1689      +18     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines 978 to 979
assert (set(get_data_1_mask[0]) - set(get_data_2_mask[0])
== set(get_data_2_mask[0]) - set(get_data_1_mask[0]))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand this check, is simple array compare insufficient here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, can you tell its Friday? 💀

Copy link
Contributor

@pllim pllim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@pllim pllim merged commit 8128788 into spacetelescope:main Dec 15, 2023
12 of 14 checks passed
@javerbukh javerbukh deleted the add-subset-rename-test branch December 15, 2023 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog-checks changelog bot directive testing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants