Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tests for automatic numbering, counters and variables #34

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

@bertfrees bertfrees changed the title Tests for automatic numbering and counters Tests for automatic numbering, counters and variables Dec 24, 2014
@bertfrees bertfrees added this to the Priority 1 milestone Jan 13, 2015
@bertfrees
Copy link
Member Author

@paivis Something for you to look at next?

Requirement 4.7:98 is about numbering of ordered lists, and more specifically nested lists, where the numbering can be complex (things like 1.a, 1.b, 2.a, etc.)

4.7:102 is about inserting certain variables at certain positions in the output. We came up with a list of variables that should be available, but maybe you can find more. This is the list:

4.7:99 and 4.7:101 are about resetting braille page numbering (e.g. start at 1 again at the beginning of a new volume).

4.7:100 is about (re-)numbering of notes.

4.7:103 and 4.7:104 should already be covered by #35.

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member Author

@mixa72 wrote:

Another question regarding the footer: With our current formatter (SBSForm) we have the option to display in the footer the headings of two adjacent sections, i.e.

  • first heading: #A
  • next heading: #B
  • footer content on the page of the section break: #A-#B

Does 4.5:82 cover this feature or is there another corresponding requirement for that? Thanks.

Hi Mischa,

Good use case! This falls under 4.7:102, although that requirement doesn't explicitly mention ranges of chapter numbers.

@mixa72
Copy link

mixa72 commented Jun 10, 2015

Hi Bert,

Here comes my example of ranges of chapter numbers in the footer (4.7:102). I used letters instead of numbers, but I guess it doesn't matter.

Regards,
Mischa

@bertfrees
Copy link
Member Author

No, doesn't matter. Thanks, added it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants