add links to really bad langs

shlomif · Jun 4, 2020 · e8cffaf · e8cffaf
1 parent 2e5f224
commit e8cffaf
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 41 additions and 1 deletion.
diff --git a/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt b/lib/hunspell/whitelist1.txt
@@ -12102,10 +12102,15 @@ wml
 
 -O2
 5's
+BANCStar
+BobX
 Checklist
 Euler630
+INTERCAL
+Malbolge
 OOP
 PyPy
+WTF
 cpython
 ghc
 goto

diff --git a/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2 b/src/philosophy/computers/your-programming-language-must-suck/index.xhtml.tt2
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ skimming code (even without syntax highlighting).
 
 <p>
 I could have gone
-on, but I think I got my message across. Thing is, when designing a programming
+on, but I think I got my message across. The point is, when designing a programming
 language, you need to make a lot of design decisions - what to include, what to
 exclude, etc. However, many of these design decisions are not 100% advantages
 or 100% disadvantages, but in fact trade-offs, and many people will question
@@ -161,6 +161,41 @@ list of links and quotations on my wiki, about the more general, non-programming
 
 </ul>
 
+[% WRAPPER h3_section id = "especially-bad-langs"  title = "Some especially bad languages"  %]
+
+<ul>
+
+<li>
+<p>
+<a href="https://github.com/jloughry/BANCStar">BANCStar</a> - "The worst programming environment in the world?" -
+not a joke.
+</p>
+</li>
+
+<li>
+<p>
+<a href="https://thedailywtf.com/articles/We-Use-BobX">"We Use BobX"</a> - on The Daily WTF.
+</p>
+</li>
+
+<li>
+<p>
+<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INTERCAL_programming_language">INTERCAL</a> - the original
+esoteric programming language.
+</p>
+</li>
+
+<li>
+<p>
+<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malbolge">Malbolge</a> - designed to be almost impossible
+to use.
+</p>
+</li>
+
+</ul>
+
+[%- END -%]
+
 [%- END -%]
 
 [% PROCESS cc_by_licence_section year = "2011", %]