Correct some broken grammar / spelling / syntax / etc.

See https://duckduckgo.com/?q=english+grammar&ia=web ;
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=english+spelling&ia=web and for the lighter side:

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Gv0H-vPoDc

* https://shlomif.livejournal.com/53966.html

* http://i.imgur.com/HL1ZR.jpg .

FAQ.docbook5.xml.tt2

@@ -2565,12 +2565,12 @@ Note that we do not mean to imply that Python or whatever are
 bad just because NASA uses them, just that you should not use
 that fact as an argument in their favour.
 </para>
-<p>
-Also note that we are almost sure that otherwise-esteemed providers
+<para>
+Also note that we are almost sure that other otherwise-esteemed providers
 of code, content, technology, education, and entertainment (e.g:
-DARPA, IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, Microsoft, etc), have
+DARPA, IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, other Microsoft), have
 their share of legacy and retrospectively poorly implemented software.
-</p>
+</para>
 </section>
 <section xml:id="can-a-copyright-owner-change-the-licence-of-an-open-source-project-if-they-dislike-someones-abuse-of-it">
 <title>Can a copyright owner change the licence of an open

FAQ.mdwn

@@ -1339,10 +1339,10 @@ Note that we do not mean to imply that Python or whatever are bad just
 because NASA uses them, just that you should not use that fact as an
 argument in their favour.
 
-Also note that we are almost sure that otherwise-esteemed providers of
-code, content, technology, education, and entertainment (e.g: DARPA,
-IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, Microsoft, etc), have their share of
-legacy and retrospectively poorly implemented software.
+Also note that we are almost sure that other otherwise-esteemed
+providers of code, content, technology, education, and entertainment
+(e.g: DARPA, IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, other Microsoft), have
+their share of legacy and retrospectively poorly implemented software.
 
 ### Can a copyright owner change the licence of an open source project if they dislike someone's abuse of it?
 

FAQ_with_ToC__generated.md

@@ -1430,10 +1430,10 @@ Note that we do not mean to imply that Python or whatever are bad just
 because NASA uses them, just that you should not use that fact as an
 argument in their favour.
 
-Also note that we are almost sure that otherwise-esteemed providers of
-code, content, technology, education, and entertainment (e.g: DARPA,
-IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, Microsoft, etc), have their share of
-legacy and retrospectively poorly implemented software.
+Also note that we are almost sure that other otherwise-esteemed
+providers of code, content, technology, education, and entertainment
+(e.g: DARPA, IBM, Google, MIT, GNU, Walt Disney, other Microsoft), have
+their share of legacy and retrospectively poorly implemented software.
 
 ### Can a copyright owner change the licence of an open source project if they dislike someone's abuse of it?