Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements to deployments #615

Merged
merged 59 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025
Merged

Improvements to deployments #615

merged 59 commits into from
Jan 26, 2025

Conversation

justin808
Copy link
Member

@justin808 justin808 commented Jan 23, 2025

This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Infrastructure

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for building Docker images.
    • Updated GitHub Actions workflows for improved deployment processes.
    • Enhanced Control Plane CLI and environment setup configurations.
    • Refined deployment workflows for review and staging environments.
    • Introduced a new workflow for promoting applications from staging to production.
    • Added a new workflow for deleting review apps based on issue comments.
  • DevOps

    • Improved deployment status tracking and reporting.
    • Updated GitHub Actions checkout and environment setup procedures.
    • Streamlined concurrency management for deployments.
    • Introduced new environment variable handling for Docker images.
    • Added new required input and output variables in deployment actions.
    • Implemented a new action for deleting Control Plane applications.
  • Features

    • New script added for retrieving commit SHA for deployments.
    • Added a new environment variable to Docker images for commit tracking.
    • Enhanced clarity and functionality of deployment actions and workflows.
    • Implemented a new process for identifying and removing stale review apps.
    • Added documentation for CI automation and Review Apps in the readme.
    • Introduced links for quick access to Control Plane resources in team documentation.
    • Added a new section in the CHANGELOG to document recent improvements.
    • Added a help command workflow for user assistance with deployment commands.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces modifications across multiple GitHub Actions workflows and configuration files, focusing on deployment processes, environment setup, and commit SHA handling. The changes include updating CLI versions, enhancing deployment workflows, improving environment setup scripts, and refining how commit information is captured and utilized during deployment processes. Additionally, new scripts for handling deployments and retrieving commit SHAs have been introduced, along with a new action for building Docker images.

Changes

File Change Summary
.controlplane/Dockerfile Restructured GIT_COMMIT_SHA declaration; now set directly from GIT_COMMIT argument.
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml Added github_token input; new review_app_url output; enhanced deployment logic and error handling.
.github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml Updated Control Plane CLI and cpflow gem versions; improved profile setup with environment variable checks.
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml Comprehensive workflow revision with concurrency management, deployment status tracking, and enhanced event handling.
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-staging.yml Updated checkout action to v4; added fetch-depth and ref parameters.
.github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml Introduced new action for building Docker images with required inputs.
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/deploy.sh New script for handling deployments and extracting Rails application URL.
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/get-commit-sha.sh New script for retrieving commit SHA for deployment purposes.
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml New workflow for automating deployment of review or staging applications.
.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app/action.yml New action for deleting Control Plane applications with required inputs.
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/delete-app.sh New script for safely deleting Control Plane applications with error handling.
.github/workflows/nightly-remove-stale-review-apps.yml Updated workflow for removing stale review apps based on PR activity.
.controlplane/readme.md Added section on CI automation and Review Apps deployment process.
.controlplane/shakacode-team.md Introduced internal notes with links for team resources.
.dockerignore Updated ignored paths for vendor dependencies and GitHub workflows.
.gitignore Modified ignored paths for Ruby vendor files.
CHANGELOG.md Added new section documenting recent changes to control-plane-flow implementation.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Deployment Rabbit Hops Along
With workflows swift and actions strong,
Commit SHAs dance, environments sing,
Control Plane magic on deployment's wing!
A rabbit's code, precise and bright,
Brings systems dancing through the night! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92ad3a7 and d5b8b7f.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/deploy.sh (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Hi 👋 To deploy a review app, please comment /deploy-review-app

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.controlplane/Dockerfile (1)

5-5: Add more descriptive comment for traceability.

While the current comment is good, we could make it more informative for better maintainability.

-# Current commit hash environment variable
+# Git commit SHA for container traceability and debugging
+# Passed during build via --build-arg GIT_COMMIT=<sha>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 005eab7 and c790151.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .controlplane/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1)

50-50: Verify cpflow CLI parameter style compatibility.

The command parameter style has been changed from space-separated (--commit value) to equals-sign (--commit=value). While both styles are common in CLI tools, we should verify that cpflow CLI specifically supports this parameter style to ensure reliable deployments.

✅ Verification successful

Parameter style change appears safe

The change to equals-sign style (--commit=value) follows common CLI conventions, and there's no evidence in the codebase suggesting that cpflow has specific parameter style restrictions. As a Ruby gem-based CLI tool, it likely follows Ruby's standard option parser conventions which support both styles.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check cpflow CLI help documentation for parameter style guidance
# and verify the current version supports both styles

# Get cpflow version and help
cpflow --version
cpflow build-image --help

# Test both parameter styles with --help to check acceptance
cpflow build-image --help --test value
cpflow build-image --help --test=value

Length of output: 518


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for cpflow command usage patterns in the codebase
echo "=== Searching for cpflow command usage ==="
rg "cpflow.*build-image" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Looking for cpflow documentation ==="
fd "README|docs" -e md | xargs rg -l "cpflow"

echo -e "\n=== Finding GitHub Action files using cpflow ==="
fd "action.yml" -t f | xargs rg -l "cpflow"

Length of output: 449


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check README content and search for specific parameter patterns
echo "=== README.md content ==="
cat README.md

echo -e "\n=== Searching for cpflow parameter patterns ==="
rg "cpflow.*--commit\s+" --type yaml
rg "cpflow.*--commit=" --type yaml

echo -e "\n=== Looking for cpflow config files ==="
fd "cpflow" -t f

Length of output: 13399

.controlplane/Dockerfile (1)

5-7: LGTM! Clean implementation of Git commit SHA handling.

The changes follow Docker best practices by:

  • Using ARG for build-time value injection
  • Converting to ENV for runtime accessibility
  • Maintaining the variable through all build stages

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/deploy-review-app

Copy link

We started working on your review-app deployment. You can track progress in the Actions Tab here on Github.

deploy-to-control-plane-review
The `set-output` command is deprecated and will be disabled soon. Please upgrade to using Environment Files. For more information see: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-10-11-github-actions-deprecating-save-state-and-set-output-commands/

deploy-to-control-plane-review
Your workflow is using a version of actions/cache that is scheduled for deprecation, actions/cache@v2. Please update your workflow to use either v3 or v4 of actions/cache to avoid interruptions. Learn more: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-12-05-notice-of-upcoming-releases-and-breaking-changes-for-github-actions/#actions-cache-v1-v2-and-actions-toolkit-cache-package-closing-down
@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/deploy-review-app

Copy link

We started working on your review-app deployment. You can track progress in the Actions Tab here on Github.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (2)

22-27: Fix formatting: Remove trailing spaces.

There are trailing spaces at the end of lines 25 and 26.

-      (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
-       github.event.comment.body == '/deploy-review-app' && 
+      (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
+       github.event.comment.body == '/deploy-review-app' &&
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


64-103: Consider DRY-ing up deployment status updates.

The deployment status update steps contain duplicated code. Consider creating a reusable composite action or sharing the script in an external file.

Example approach:

# .github/actions/update-deployment-status/action.yml
name: 'Update Deployment Status'
inputs:
  state:
    required: true
  deployment_id:
    required: true
  description:
    required: true
  environment_url:
    required: false
runs:
  using: 'composite'
  steps:
    - uses: actions/github-script@v7
      with:
        script: |
          const params = {
            owner: context.repo.owner,
            repo: context.repo.repo,
            deployment_id: ${{ inputs.deployment_id }},
            state: '${{ inputs.state }}',
            description: '${{ inputs.description }}'
          };
          if ('${{ inputs.environment_url }}') {
            params.environment_url = '${{ inputs.environment_url }}';
          }
          await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(params);

This would simplify the workflow steps to:

- uses: ./.github/actions/update-deployment-status
  with:
    state: in_progress
    deployment_id: ${{ steps.create-deployment.outputs.deployment_id }}
    description: 'Deployment is in progress'
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

82-82: property "deploy" is not defined in object type {create-deployment: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8355030 and f19d79f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

31-31: property "deploy" is not defined in object type {create-deployment: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)


53-53: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


53-53: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


82-82: property "deploy" is not defined in object type {create-deployment: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/actions/setup-environment/action.yml (2)

Line range hint 11-12: Consider pinning Ruby to a more stable version.

Ruby 3.3.4 is a very recent version that might have undiscovered issues. Consider using a more established version like 3.2.x for production deployments.


17-19: Verify compatibility with updated package versions.

The Control Plane CLI (3.3.0) and cpflow gem (4.1.0) versions have been updated. Please ensure:

  1. These versions are compatible with each other
  2. No breaking changes affect your deployment workflow
  3. The versions are stable for production use
✅ Verification successful

Version updates appear safe to proceed

The documentation shows both tools are actively used in the deployment workflow and recommends staying up to date. The version bumps are minor (3.1.0 → 3.3.0 for Control Plane CLI and 4.0.0 → 4.1.0 for cpflow), suggesting backward compatibility is maintained. The tools have distinct roles with cpln CLI handling Control Plane operations and cpflow managing deployment workflows.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check release notes and compatibility information for the updated packages

# Check Control Plane CLI changelog
echo "Checking Control Plane CLI changelog for version 3.3.0..."
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/controlplane-com/cli/v3.3.0/CHANGELOG.md" || echo "Changelog not found"

# Check cpflow gem information
echo -e "\nChecking cpflow gem information for version 4.1.0..."
curl -s "https://rubygems.org/api/v1/versions/cpflow/4.1.0.json" | jq '.'

Length of output: 474


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage patterns and documentation of both tools
echo "=== Searching for Control Plane CLI usage ==="
rg "cpln" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Searching for cpflow usage ==="
rg "cpflow" -A 2 -B 2

echo -e "\n=== Looking for documentation files ==="
fd -i "readme|changelog|upgrade" -e md -e txt

echo -e "\n=== Checking for version constraints ==="
fd "gemfile|package.json|.tool-versions|.ruby-version" --type f

Length of output: 1397


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check version constraints and documentation
echo "=== Checking Gemfile for cpflow version ==="
cat Gemfile | grep -A 2 "cpflow"

echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json for Control Plane CLI version ==="
cat package.json | grep -A 2 "@controlplane"

echo -e "\n=== Checking Control Plane documentation ==="
cat .controlplane/readme.md || echo "Control Plane documentation not found"

echo -e "\n=== Checking Gemfile.lock for current versions ==="
cat Gemfile.lock | grep -A 5 "cpflow"

Length of output: 5848

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (3)

5-13: Well-structured workflow triggers and concurrency handling!

Good improvements:

  • Explicit PR event types prevent unnecessary workflow runs
  • Concurrency configuration prevents redundant deployments
  • Cancellation of in-progress deployments keeps resources efficient

18-18: Good environment variable handling!

The PR_NUMBER fallback pattern correctly handles both pull request and issue comment events.


30-32: Verify the 'deploy' step exists.

The outputs reference steps.deploy.outputs.app_url, but the 'deploy' step is not visible in the provided code (possibly in the "rest of your existing steps" section).

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

31-31: property "deploy" is not defined in object type {create-deployment: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: object}; getref: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}

(expression)

Comment on lines 53 to 56
run: |
echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix shell script quoting.

Add double quotes around variables to prevent word splitting and globbing:

-          echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "${{ github.repository }}" --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
run: |
echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
echo "PR_REF=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "${{ github.repository }}" --json headRefName | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

53-53: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


53-53: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Copy link

🚀 Starting new deployment for commit: d2be5ae

Create GitHub Deployment step
Copy link

🚀 Starting new deployment for commit: 5a9f8f7

Copy link

🚀 Starting new deployment for commit: 8bd409c

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (2)

18-18: Add validation for PR_NUMBER.

While the fallback mechanism is good, consider adding validation to ensure the PR_NUMBER is always set:

-  PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
+  PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number || 'ERROR_NO_PR_NUMBER' }}

38-44: Simplify the job condition.

The current condition is complex and could be simplified for better readability:

-    if: |
-      needs.check-concurrent.outputs.cancelled != 'true' &&
-      (github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
-       github.event_name == 'pull_request' ||
-       (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
-        github.event.comment.body == '/deploy-review-app' && 
-        github.event.issue.pull_request))
+    if: >-
+      needs.check-concurrent.outputs.cancelled != 'true' &&
+      (
+        github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
+        github.event_name == 'pull_request' ||
+        (
+          github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
+          github.event.comment.body == '/deploy-review-app' &&
+          github.event.issue.pull_request
+        )
+      )
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 42-42: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f19d79f and de55983.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


28-28: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


53-53: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)


89-89: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


89-89: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


130-130: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

[error] 42-42: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 63-63: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 135-135: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 142-142: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 160-160: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 167-167: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (4)

52-54: LGTM! Output configuration looks good.

The outputs are well-defined and will be useful for downstream jobs or other workflows.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

53-53: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)


126-174: LGTM! Comprehensive deployment status handling.

The success and failure paths are well-implemented with:

  • Detailed status messages
  • Proper GitHub deployment status updates
  • Helpful links to logs in case of failures
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

130-130: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 135-135: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 142-142: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 160-160: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 167-167: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


29-34: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix shell script quoting.

Add double quotes around variables to prevent word splitting and globbing:

-            echo "cancelled=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-            echo "cancelled=false" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+            echo "cancelled=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+            echo "cancelled=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5-7: Verify the target branch name.

The workflow is configured to trigger on PRs targeting the master branch. Please verify if this should be main instead, as many repositories have migrated from master to main.

✅ Verification successful

Branch configuration is correct

The repository consistently uses master as its default branch across all workflow files and documentation. No changes are needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the default branch name
gh api repos/${{ github.repository }} --jq .default_branch

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for branch references in workflow files and documentation
echo "=== Workflow Files ==="
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows --exec grep -l "branches.*\(main\|master\)" {} \; | while read -r file; do
    echo "File: $file"
    grep -A 1 "branches.*\(main\|master\)" "$file"
done

echo -e "\n=== Documentation and Configuration ==="
for file in README.md .github/* package.json; do
    if [ -f "$file" ]; then
        echo "File: $file"
        grep -i "branch.*\(main\|master\)" "$file" || true
    fi
done

Length of output: 2401

Comment on lines 112 to 118
- name: Configure app name
id: app-config
run: |
echo "PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}"
echo "APP_NAME=qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
echo "App Name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}"
- uses: ./.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane
APP_NAME="qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}"
echo "APP_NAME=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_ENV
echo "app_name=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix shell script quoting in app name configuration.

Add double quotes around variables to prevent word splitting and globbing:

-          echo "APP_NAME=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_ENV
-          echo "app_name=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          echo "APP_NAME=$APP_NAME" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
+          echo "app_name=$APP_NAME" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Configure app name
id: app-config
run: |
echo "PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}"
echo "APP_NAME=qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
echo "App Name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}"
- uses: ./.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane
APP_NAME="qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}"
echo "APP_NAME=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_ENV
echo "app_name=$APP_NAME" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Configure app name
id: app-config
run: |
APP_NAME="qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}"
echo "APP_NAME=$APP_NAME" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
echo "app_name=$APP_NAME" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


114-114: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

Copy link

🚀 Starting new deployment for commit: 5a7de1c

Copy link

✅ Deployment successful!
Environment: review-app
Commit: 5a7de1c
URL:

Copy link

Copy link

✅ Deployment successful!
Environment: review-app
Commit: 58e724f
URL:
Status: https://github.com/shakacode/react-webpack-rails-tutorial/actions/runs/12921625699/job/deploy-to-control-plane-review?pr=615

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (2)

18-19: Consider adding comments to document environment variables.

While the environment variables are well-structured, adding comments would improve maintainability by explaining:

  • The fallback logic for PR_NUMBER
  • The components of STATUS_URL
+  # PR number from either pull_request or issue event
   PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
+  # URL to the GitHub Actions job status page
   STATUS_URL: ${{ github.server_url }}/${{ github.repository }}/actions/runs/${{ github.run_id }}/jobs/${{ github.job }}?pr=${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}

39-45: Consider improving the job condition readability.

While the logic is correct, the condition could be more maintainable by extracting complex conditions into named expressions:

    if: |
      needs.check-concurrent.outputs.cancelled != 'true' &&
      (
        github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
        github.event_name == 'pull_request' ||
        (
          github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
          github.event.comment.body == '/deploy-review-app' && 
          github.event.issue.pull_request
        )
      )
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between de55983 and 8918cd2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:28: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


29-29: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:5:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


54-54: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)


102-102: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


102-102: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:117: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


127-127: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


127-127: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:30: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


143-143: property "app_url" is not defined in object type {}

(expression)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml

[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 44-44: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 71-71: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 81-81: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 149-149: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 151-151: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 169-169: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 171-171: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-review.yml (2)

5-13: Well-structured workflow trigger and concurrency configuration!

The changes effectively:

  • Automate deployments on PR events (open/sync/reopen)
  • Prevent resource conflicts with concurrent deployments
  • Ensure only the latest deployment runs

113-123: Excellent implementation of deployment status tracking!

The comprehensive status tracking with in_progress, success, and failure states provides clear visibility into the deployment process.

Also applies to: 139-159, 161-178

run: |
if [ "${{ github.run_attempt }}" != "1" ]; then
echo "⚠️ Cancelling previous deployment due to new code push..."
echo "cancelled=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix shell script quoting in concurrent check.

Add quotes around GITHUB_OUTPUT to prevent word splitting:

-            echo "cancelled=true" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+            echo "cancelled=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
-            echo "cancelled=false" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+            echo "cancelled=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

Also applies to: 34-34

${context.payload.commits ? `\nChanges: ${context.payload.commits[0].message}` : ''}
Status: ${{ env.STATUS_URL }}`;
await eval(process.env.createComment)(message);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider security implications of using eval.

The use of eval to execute the createComment function could pose security risks. Consider using a more direct approach:

-            await eval(process.env.createComment)(message);
+            const createComment = async (message) => {
+              await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+                issue_number: context.issue.number || context.payload.pull_request.number,
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                body: message
+              });
+            };
+            await createComment(message);

Also applies to: 150-150, 170-170

Copy link

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

🚀 Deploying to Control Plane for PR #615, commit 2be9c2f

⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...

View Deploy Logs

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.dockerignore (1)

⚠️ Security concern: Exposed secret key in start-production-server

The verification revealed a hardcoded SECRET_KEY_BASE in scripts/start-production-server. While the directory sizes are minimal (34KB total), exposing sensitive information in Docker context is a security risk.

  • Move the SECRET_KEY_BASE to an environment variable
  • Consider keeping spec/ excluded as it's not needed in production
  • Review the placement of start-production-server script
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-47: Verify the impact of including spec/ and scripts/ directories.

The removal of spec/ and scripts/ from the Docker ignore list means these directories will now be included in the Docker build context. While this aligns with the deployment improvements mentioned in the PR, please verify:

  1. That including test files won't bloat the production images unnecessarily
  2. That no sensitive information exists in these directories
  3. That these directories are required for the new deployment processes
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential sensitive information in spec/ and scripts/
echo "Checking for potential sensitive information..."
rg -i "password|secret|key|token|credential" spec/ scripts/

# Check the size impact
echo "Calculating directory sizes..."
du -sh spec/ scripts/

# List all files that will now be included
echo "Files that will be included in Docker context:"
find spec/ scripts/ -type f -not -path "*/\.*" | sort

Length of output: 1409

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (2)

188-196: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove undefined input parameter.

The PR_NUMBER input is not defined in the build-docker-image action's metadata.

Apply this diff to remove the undefined input:

       - name: Build Docker Image
         if: steps.determine_action.outputs.action == 'deploy'
         uses: ./.github/actions/build-docker-image
         with:
           app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
           org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
           commit: ${{ env.COMMIT_HASH }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}

234-279: ⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for deployment status updates.

The deployment status update logic should handle potential API errors.

Apply this diff to add error handling:

             // Update deployment status
-            await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(deploymentStatus);
+            try {
+              await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(deploymentStatus);
+            } catch (error) {
+              console.error('Failed to update deployment status:', error);
+              throw error;
+            }
             
             // Update the initial comment
-            await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
-              owner: context.repo.owner,
-              repo: context.repo.repo,
-              comment_id: commentId,
-              body: isSuccess ? successMessage : failureMessage
-            });
+            try {
+              await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                comment_id: commentId,
+                body: isSuccess ? successMessage : failureMessage
+              });
+            } catch (error) {
+              console.error('Failed to update comment:', error);
+              throw error;
+            }
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1)

66-76: Improve timeout command error handling.

The timeout command's error handling could be more robust.

Apply this diff to improve error handling:

-if ! timeout $WAIT_TIMEOUT bash -c "cpflow ps:wait -a ${{ inputs.app_name }}"; then
-  TIMEOUT_EXIT=$?
-  if [ $TIMEOUT_EXIT -eq 124 ]; then
-    echo "❌ Timed out waiting for workloads after ${WAIT_TIMEOUT} seconds"
-  else
-    echo "❌ Workloads did not become ready for PR #$PR_NUMBER (exit code: $TIMEOUT_EXIT)"
-  fi
-  echo "Last deployment output:"
-  echo "$DEPLOY_OUTPUT"
-  exit 1
-fi
+if ! timeout "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" bash -c "cpflow ps:wait -a '${{ inputs.app_name }}'"; then
+  TIMEOUT_EXIT=$?
+  case $TIMEOUT_EXIT in
+    124)
+      echo "❌ Timed out waiting for workloads after ${WAIT_TIMEOUT} seconds"
+      ;;
+    125)
+      echo "❌ The timeout command itself failed"
+      ;;
+    126|127)
+      echo "❌ Command not found or not executable"
+      ;;
+    *)
+      echo "❌ Workloads did not become ready for PR #${PR_NUMBER} (exit code: ${TIMEOUT_EXIT})"
+      ;;
+  esac
+  echo "Last deployment output:"
+  echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}"
+  exit 1
+fi
.controlplane/readme.md (2)

129-129: Improve preposition usage.

Replace "for" with "to" to improve readability.

-_Note, some of the URL references are internal for the ShakaCode team._
+_Note, some of the URL references are internal to the ShakaCode team._
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~129-~129: The preposition “to” seems more likely in this position than the preposition “for”.
Context: ...some of the URL references are internal for the ShakaCode team._ Review Apps (dep...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION_FOR_TO)


151-154: Improve documentation clarity by explaining Git aliases.

The Git aliases used in the workflow steps may not be familiar to all users.

-3. Run a script like `ga .github && gc -m fixes && gp` to commit and push changes (ga = git add, gc = git commit, gp = git push)
+3. Run the following Git commands to commit and push your changes:
+   ```bash
+   git add .github
+   git commit -m "fixes"
+   git push
+   ```
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c46f595 and 2be9c2f.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .controlplane/readme.md (1 hunks)
  • .controlplane/shakacode-team.md (1 hunks)
  • .dockerignore (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .controlplane/shakacode-team.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • .gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
.controlplane/readme.md

[uncategorized] ~129-~129: The preposition “to” seems more likely in this position than the preposition “for”.
Context: ...some of the URL references are internal for the ShakaCode team._ Review Apps (dep...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_PREPOSITION_FOR_TO)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

51-51: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Process-Deployment-Command
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.dockerignore (2)

22-22: LGTM: Updated vendor path aligns with conventions.

The change from vendor/ruby to vendor/bundle follows modern Ruby/Rails conventions for dependency management.


24-25: LGTM: Appropriate exclusion of GitHub workflows.

Adding .github/ to the ignore list is correct as these CI/CD configurations aren't needed in the Docker image.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1)

52-56: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix security issue with untrusted input.

Using github.event.comment.body directly in shell scripts is a security risk. Pass it through an environment variable instead.

Apply this diff to fix the security issue:

+        env:
+          COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
         run: |
-          if [[ "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/delete-review-app" ]]; then
+          if [[ "${COMMENT_BODY}" == "/delete-review-app" ]]; then
             echo "action=delete" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           else
             echo "action=deploy" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           fi

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

shell: bash
run: |
echo "Deploying to Control Plane"
cpflow deploy-image -a ${{ inputs.app_name }} --run-release-phase --org ${{inputs.org}} --verbose
echo "🚀 Deploying app for PR #$PR_NUMBER..."
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script quoting.

The shell script variables should be properly quoted to prevent word splitting and globbing issues.

Apply this diff to fix the quoting:

-echo "🚀 Deploying app for PR #$PR_NUMBER..."
+echo "🚀 Deploying app for PR #${PR_NUMBER}..."

-echo "$DEPLOY_OUTPUT"
+echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}"

Also applies to: 78-80

Comment on lines 47 to 50
if ! DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(cpflow deploy-image -a ${{ inputs.app_name }} --run-release-phase --org ${{ inputs.org }}); then
echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #$PR_NUMBER"
exit 1
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for deployment command.

The deployment command should handle potential errors and provide better feedback.

Apply this diff to add error handling:

-if ! DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(cpflow deploy-image -a ${{ inputs.app_name }} --run-release-phase --org ${{ inputs.org }}); then
-  echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #$PR_NUMBER"
-  exit 1
-fi
+if ! DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(cpflow deploy-image -a "${{ inputs.app_name }}" --run-release-phase --org "${{ inputs.org }}" 2>&1); then
+  echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #${PR_NUMBER}"
+  echo "Error output:"
+  echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}"
+  exit 1
+fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if ! DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(cpflow deploy-image -a ${{ inputs.app_name }} --run-release-phase --org ${{ inputs.org }}); then
echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #$PR_NUMBER"
exit 1
fi
if ! DEPLOY_OUTPUT=$(cpflow deploy-image -a "${{ inputs.app_name }}" --run-release-phase --org "${{ inputs.org }}" 2>&1); then
echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #${PR_NUMBER}"
echo "Error output:"
echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}"
exit 1
fi

Comment on lines 62 to 63
WAIT_TIMEOUT=${WAIT_TIMEOUT:-${{ inputs.wait_timeout }}}
echo "⏳ Waiting for all workloads to be ready (timeout: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}s)..."
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add timeout validation and remove trailing spaces.

The timeout value should be validated and trailing spaces should be removed.

Apply this diff to add validation and remove trailing spaces:

-WAIT_TIMEOUT=${WAIT_TIMEOUT:-${{ inputs.wait_timeout }}}
-echo "⏳ Waiting for all workloads to be ready (timeout: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}s)..."
+# Validate timeout value
+WAIT_TIMEOUT=${WAIT_TIMEOUT:-${{ inputs.wait_timeout }}}
+if ! [[ "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
+  echo "❌ Invalid timeout value: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}"
+  exit 1
+fi
+echo "⏳ Waiting for all workloads to be ready (timeout: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}s)"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
WAIT_TIMEOUT=${WAIT_TIMEOUT:-${{ inputs.wait_timeout }}}
echo "⏳ Waiting for all workloads to be ready (timeout: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}s)..."
# Validate timeout value
WAIT_TIMEOUT=${WAIT_TIMEOUT:-${{ inputs.wait_timeout }}}
if ! [[ "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]]; then
echo "❌ Invalid timeout value: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}"
exit 1
fi
echo "⏳ Waiting for all workloads to be ready (timeout: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT}s)"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

✅ Deployment successful for PR #615, commit 5f50639

🚀 Rails App: https://rails-16nj5dxrn5644.cpln.app

Control Plane Console

View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1)

44-61: Consider using a more robust URL extraction pattern.

The current pattern grep -oP 'https://rails-[^[:space:]]*\.cpln\.app(?=\s|$)' might be too specific. Consider using a more flexible pattern that can handle variations in the URL format.

-RAILS_URL=$(echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}" | grep -oP 'https://rails-[^[:space:]]*\.cpln\.app(?=\s|$)' | head -n1)
+RAILS_URL=$(echo "${DEPLOY_OUTPUT}" | grep -oP 'https://[^[:space:]]*\.cpln\.app(?=\s|$)' | grep -i rails | head -n1)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1)

16-20: Add validation for required environment variables.

Consider adding validation for required environment variables at the start of the workflow.

Add this step after the environment setup:

      - name: Validate Environment Variables
        run: |
          for var in "APP_NAME" "CPLN_ORG" "CPLN_TOKEN" "PR_NUMBER"; do
            if [ -z "${!var}" ]; then
              echo "❌ Required environment variable $var is not set"
              exit 1
            fi
          done
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2be9c2f and 5f50639.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

51-51: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Process-Deployment-Command
  • GitHub Check: test (22.x, 3.3.4)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (4)

13-19: LGTM! Input parameters are well-defined.

The new inputs github_token and wait_timeout are properly configured with appropriate descriptions and requirements.


21-24: LGTM! Output parameter is well-defined.

The new output rails_url is properly configured with a clear description and correct value reference.


32-38: LGTM! Commit SHA retrieval is properly configured.

The step correctly executes the script with necessary environment variables.


64-78: LGTM! Comprehensive timeout and error handling.

The workload readiness check includes proper timeout handling and clear error messages for different failure scenarios.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (3)

49-56: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix security issue with untrusted input.

The comment body is used directly in the script, which is a potential security risk.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

       - name: Determine Action
         id: determine_action
         run: |
-          if [[ "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/delete-review-app" ]]; then
+          COMMENT_BODY="${{ github.event.comment.body }}"
+          if [[ "${COMMENT_BODY}" == "/delete-review-app" ]]; then
             echo "action=delete" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           else
             echo "action=deploy" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           fi

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

51-51: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)


193-201: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove undefined input parameter.

The PR_NUMBER input is passed to the build-docker-image action but is not defined in the action's metadata.

       - name: Build Docker Image
         if: steps.determine_action.outputs.action == 'deploy'
         uses: ./.github/actions/build-docker-image
         with:
           app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
           org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
           commit: ${{ env.COMMIT_HASH }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


234-284: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for GitHub API calls.

The status update logic should handle potential API errors.

Apply these improvements:

             // Update deployment status
-            await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(deploymentStatus);
+            try {
+              await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(deploymentStatus);
+            } catch (error) {
+              console.error('Failed to update deployment status:', error);
+              throw error;
+            }
             
             // Update the initial comment
-            await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
-              owner: context.repo.owner,
-              repo: context.repo.repo,
-              comment_id: commentId,
-              body: isSuccess ? successMessage : failureMessage
-            });
+            try {
+              await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                comment_id: commentId,
+                body: isSuccess ? successMessage : failureMessage
+              });
+            } catch (error) {
+              console.error('Failed to update comment:', error);
+              throw error;
+            }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

🚀 Deploying to Control Plane for PR #615, commit e0cf883

⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...

View Deploy Logs

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #615, commit b27783e

🚀 Review App for PR #615: https://rails-16nj5dxrn5644.cpln.app

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-staging.yml (1)

24-27: LGTM! Consider adding path filters.

The checkout configuration is correct with proper fetch depth and branch reference. Consider adding path filters to optimize the workflow by only triggering on relevant file changes.

 on:
   push:
     branches: [master]
+    paths:
+      - 'src/**'
+      - 'Dockerfile'
+      - '.github/workflows/**'
.github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml (1)

Line range hint 47-48: Improve temporary file handling.

The trap command is correctly set up, but consider adding error handling for mktemp failure.

-TEMP_OUTPUT=$(mktemp)
-trap 'rm -f "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"' EXIT
+TEMP_OUTPUT=$(mktemp) || {
+  echo "❌ Failed to create temporary file"
+  exit 1
+}
+trap 'rm -f "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"' EXIT ERR
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (1)

35-38: Add retries for network failures.

Add retry logic for the promotion command to handle transient network issues.

-          if ! cpflow promote-app-from-upstream -a "${APP_NAME}" -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" --org "${CPLN_ORG}"; then
+          max_attempts=3
+          attempt=1
+          while [ $attempt -le $max_attempts ]; do
+            if cpflow promote-app-from-upstream -a "${APP_NAME}" -t "${UPSTREAM_TOKEN}" --org "${CPLN_ORG}"; then
+              break
+            fi
+            echo "Attempt $attempt of $max_attempts failed"
+            [ $attempt -eq $max_attempts ] && exit 1
+            attempt=$((attempt + 1))
+            sleep 5
+          done
.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (2)

59-65: Improve URL extraction reliability.

The current URL extraction might be fragile. Consider using a more robust pattern matching.

-        REVIEW_APP_URL=$(grep -oP 'https://rails-[^[:space:]]*\.cpln\.app(?=\s|$)' "${TEMP_OUTPUT}" | head -n1)
+        # Extract app URL using a more specific pattern
+        REVIEW_APP_URL=$(grep -oP 'https://rails-[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.cpln\.app(?=/|$)' "${TEMP_OUTPUT}" | head -n1)
         if [ -z "${REVIEW_APP_URL}" ]; then
           echo "❌ Failed to get app URL from deployment output"
-          echo "Deployment output:"
-          cat "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"
+          echo "Last 10 lines of deployment output:"
+          tail -n 10 "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"
           exit 1
         fi

72-82: Add timeout validation and progress indicator.

Add input validation for timeout and show progress during the wait.

-        if ! timeout "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" bash -c "cpflow ps:wait -a \"${{ inputs.app_name }}\"" 2>&1 | tee -a "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"; then
+        # Validate timeout value
+        if ! [[ "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" =~ ^[0-9]+$ ]] || [ "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" -lt 1 ] || [ "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" -gt 3600 ]; then
+          echo "❌ Invalid timeout value: ${WAIT_TIMEOUT} (must be between 1 and 3600 seconds)"
+          exit 1
+        fi
+
+        # Show progress during wait
+        if ! timeout "${WAIT_TIMEOUT}" bash -c "while cpflow ps:wait -a \"${{ inputs.app_name }}\"; do echo -n '.'; sleep 5; done" 2>&1 | tee -a "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"; then
           TIMEOUT_EXIT=$?
           if [ ${TIMEOUT_EXIT} -eq 124 ]; then
             echo "❌ Timed out waiting for workloads after ${WAIT_TIMEOUT} seconds"
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f50639 and b27783e.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/get-commit-sha.sh (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane-staging.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/scripts/get-commit-sha.sh
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/promote-staging-to-production.yml

[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 24-24: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 29-29: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 34-34: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 39-39: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 41-41: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 49-49: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 52-52: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml

[error] 45-45: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 49-49: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 57-57: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 66-66: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 70-70: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 83-83: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

[error] 25-25: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 27-27: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 28-28: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 104-104: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 126-126: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 136-136: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 159-159: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 165-165: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 189-189: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 197-197: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 235-235: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 246-246: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 248-248: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 257-257: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 263-263: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml

[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

41-41: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


41-41: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:60: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


41-41: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:59: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:4:27: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


51-51: "github.event.comment.body" is potentially untrusted. avoid using it directly in inline scripts. instead, pass it through an environment variable. see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/security-guides/security-hardening-for-github-actions for more details

(expression)


144-144: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:86: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


148-148: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:42: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Process-Deployment-Command
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/actions/build-docker-image/action.yml (1)

27-32: Add timeout and resource constraints.

The Docker build process should have timeout and resource constraints to prevent hung builds and resource exhaustion.

.github/actions/deploy-to-control-plane/action.yml (1)

51-56: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add detailed error output.

Enhance error handling by capturing and displaying detailed error information.

-        if ! cpflow deploy-image -a "${{ inputs.app_name }}" --run-release-phase --org "${{ inputs.org }}" 2>&1 | tee "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"; then
+        if ! DEPLOY_ERROR=$(cpflow deploy-image -a "${{ inputs.app_name }}" --run-release-phase --org "${{ inputs.org }}" 2>&1 | tee "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"); then
           echo "❌ Deployment failed for PR #${PR_NUMBER}"
-          echo "Error output:"
-          cat "${TEMP_OUTPUT}"
+          echo "Error details:"
+          echo "${DEPLOY_ERROR}" | grep -A 5 "Error:"
+          echo "Full logs available in the workflow run"
           exit 1
         fi

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (2)

173-181: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove undefined input parameter.

The PR_NUMBER input is passed to the build-docker-image action but is not defined in the action's metadata.

       - name: Build Docker Image
         if: steps.determine_action.outputs.action == 'deploy'
         uses: ./.github/actions/build-docker-image
         with:
           app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
           org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
           commit: ${{ env.COMMIT_HASH }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


52-56: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix security issue with untrusted input.

The comment body is used directly in the script, which is a potential security risk.

-          if [[ "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == "/delete-review-app" ]]; then
+          # Sanitize and validate input
+          COMMENT_BODY="${{ github.event.comment.body }}"
+          if [[ "${COMMENT_BODY}" =~ ^/delete-review-app$ ]]; then
             echo "action=delete" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           else
             echo "action=deploy" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
           fi

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Comment on lines +6 to +9
confirm_promotion:
description: 'Type "promote" to confirm promotion of staging to production'
required: true
type: string
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add environment protection rules.

Consider adding environment protection rules to require approval before promoting to production.

 on:
   workflow_dispatch:
     inputs:
       confirm_promotion:
         description: 'Type "promote" to confirm promotion of staging to production'
         required: true
         type: string
+
+environment:
+  name: production
+  rules:
+    - type: required_reviewers
+      reviewers:
+        count: 2

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +54 to +56
gh release create "${RELEASE_TAG}" \
--title "Production Release ${RELEASE_DATE}" \
--notes "🚀 Production deployment on ${RELEASE_DATE}"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Validate release tag uniqueness.

Add validation to ensure the release tag doesn't already exist.

           # Create a release tag
           RELEASE_TAG="production-${RELEASE_DATE}"
+          
+          # Check if tag exists
+          if gh release view "${RELEASE_TAG}" &>/dev/null; then
+            RELEASE_TAG="${RELEASE_TAG}-$(date '+%H-%M-%S')"
+          fi

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +43 to +45
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName,headRefOid)
echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script quoting.

Add proper quoting to prevent word splitting and globbing.

-          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName,headRefOid)
-          echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-          echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "${{ github.repository }}" --json headRefName,headRefOid)
+          echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+          echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName,headRefOid)
echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "${{ github.repository }}" --json headRefName,headRefOid)
echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #615, commit 66a4114

🚀 Review App for PR #615: https://rails-16nj5dxrn5644.cpln.app

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/delete-review-app

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

✅ Deployment complete for PR #615, commit 3426aca

🚀 Review App for PR #615

📋 View Completed Action Build and Deploy Logs

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/help

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/delete-review-app

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (4)

7-10: Consider optimizing permissions scope.

The workflow only needs to read pull request data and write comments. Consider reducing the pull-requests permission to read:

 permissions:
   issues: write
-  pull-requests: write
+  pull-requests: read

13-16: Remove trailing spaces in conditions.

The conditions are logically correct, but there are trailing spaces that should be removed:

    if: |
-      github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
-      github.event.issue.pull_request && 
+      github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
+      github.event.issue.pull_request &&
       github.event.comment.body == '/help'
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


46-46: Remove trailing space.

Remove the trailing space on this line.

-            
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 46-46: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


47-52: Add error handling for the API call.

Consider adding try-catch block around the API call to handle potential errors gracefully:

-            await github.rest.issues.createComment({
-              owner: context.repo.owner,
-              repo: context.repo.repo,
-              issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
-              body: helpMessage
-            });
+            try {
+              await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
+                body: helpMessage
+              });
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.setFailed(`Failed to post help message: ${error.message}`);
+            }
.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (2)

68-71: Add error handling for console URL construction.

The console URL construction assumes the organization exists. Consider adding a fallback or check.

Apply this diff to add error handling:

-const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${process.env.CPLN_ORG}/workloads/${process.env.APP_NAME}`;
+const org = process.env.CPLN_ORG || 'unknown-org';
+const appName = process.env.APP_NAME || 'unknown-app';
+const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${org}/workloads/${appName}`;
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 71-71: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


20-21: Fix trailing whitespace issues.

There are trailing spaces on several lines that should be removed.

Apply this diff to fix the trailing spaces:

-      github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
-      github.event.issue.pull_request && 
+      github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
+      github.event.issue.pull_request &&

Also applies to: 71-71, 79-79

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1)

3-3: Simplify the run-name expression for better readability.

The current run-name uses a complex conditional expression. Consider breaking it down for clarity:

-run-name: ${{ (github.event_name == 'pull_request' || (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && github.event.issue.pull_request)) && 'Deploying Review App' || format('Deploying {0} to Staging App', github.ref_name) }}
+run-name: >-
+  ${{
+    (
+      github.event_name == 'pull_request' ||
+      (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && github.event.issue.pull_request)
+    ) && 'Deploying Review App' ||
+    format('Deploying {0} to Staging App', github.ref_name)
+  }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b27783e and 3426aca.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 46-46: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml

[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 71-71: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 79-79: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 27-27: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 68-68: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 71-71: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 76-76: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 79-79: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 87-87: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 99-99: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 125-125: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 152-152: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 175-175: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 186-186: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 188-188: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 197-197: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 203-203: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 210-210: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml

57-57: missing input "app_name" which is required by action "Delete Control Plane App" defined at "./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app". all required inputs are "app_name", "org"

(action)


57-57: missing input "org" which is required by action "Delete Control Plane App" defined at "./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app". all required inputs are "app_name", "org"

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Process-Deployment-Command
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (1)

1-52: Well-structured workflow implementation!

The workflow provides clear and helpful documentation for PR commands. The implementation is clean and follows GitHub Actions best practices.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 46-46: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (2)

1-12: LGTM! Well-configured permissions and triggers.

The workflow is properly configured with:

  • Appropriate trigger on issue comments
  • Explicit permissions following the principle of least privilege

17-24: LGTM! Well-defined job conditions.

The conditions are properly configured to ensure the job only runs when appropriate.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (4)

11-14: LGTM! Well-implemented concurrency control.

The concurrency setup effectively prevents multiple deployments from running simultaneously and cancels in-progress runs, which is crucial for deployment workflows.


24-34: LGTM! Well-structured job conditions and permissions.

The job:

  • Correctly handles both PR and comment triggers
  • Has explicit and minimal required permissions
  • Uses proper conditional syntax
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 27-27: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


133-140: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove undefined input parameter.

The PR_NUMBER input is passed to the build-docker-image action but isn't defined in the action's metadata.

       - name: Build Docker Image
         uses: ./.github/actions/build-docker-image
         with:
           app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
           org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
           commit: ${{ env.COMMIT_HASH }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ env.PR_NUMBER }}

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


42-44: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix shell script quoting.

The shell script is missing proper quoting which could cause issues with special characters.

-          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --repo ${{ github.repository }} --json headRefName,headRefOid)
-          echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
-          echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view "$PR_NUMBER" --repo "${{ github.repository }}" --json headRefName,headRefOid)
+          echo "PR_REF=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefName')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+          echo "PR_SHA=$(echo "$PR_DATA" | jq -r '.headRefOid')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Comment on lines 13 to 16
env:
CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }}
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix inconsistent secret usage between workflow and step level.

There's an inconsistency in the secrets being used:

  • Workflow level uses CPLN_ORG_STAGING and CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING
  • Delete Review App step uses CPLN_ORG and CPLN_TOKEN

This could lead to confusion or errors in the deployment process.

Apply this diff to maintain consistency:

 env:
-  CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }}
-  CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }}
+  CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG }}
+  CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}

Also applies to: 58-61

Comment on lines 56 to 62
- name: Delete Review App
uses: ./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app
env:
APP_NAME: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG }}
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add missing required inputs for delete-control-plane-app action.

The action ./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app requires inputs that are not provided:

  • Required: app_name, org
  • Current: Using environment variables instead

Apply this diff to fix the action usage:

 - name: Delete Review App
   uses: ./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app
+  with:
+    app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
+    org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
   env:
     APP_NAME: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
     CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG }}
     CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Delete Review App
uses: ./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app
env:
APP_NAME: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG }}
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}
- name: Delete Review App
uses: ./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app
with:
app_name: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
org: ${{ env.CPLN_ORG }}
env:
APP_NAME: ${{ env.APP_NAME }}
CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG }}
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN }}
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

57-57: missing input "app_name" which is required by action "Delete Control Plane App" defined at "./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app". all required inputs are "app_name", "org"

(action)


57-57: missing input "org" which is required by action "Delete Control Plane App" defined at "./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app". all required inputs are "app_name", "org"

(action)

Comment on lines 16 to 21
env:
APP_NAME: qa-react-webpack-rails-tutorial-pr-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}
CPLN_ORG: ${{ secrets.CPLN_ORG_STAGING }}
CPLN_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation for required secrets.

The workflow uses sensitive environment variables but doesn't validate their presence.

Add this step after the checkout:

      - name: Validate Required Secrets
        run: |
          missing_secrets=()
          for secret in "CPLN_TOKEN_STAGING" "CPLN_ORG_STAGING"; do
            if [ -z "${!secret}" ]; then
              missing_secrets+=("$secret")
            fi
          done
          
          if [ ${#missing_secrets[@]} -ne 0 ]; then
            echo "❌ Required secrets are not set: ${missing_secrets[*]}"
            exit 1
          fi

Comment on lines 81 to 96
const comment = await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: process.env.PR_NUMBER,
body: '⏳ Initializing deployment...'
});

// Create GitHub deployment
const deployment = await github.rest.repos.createDeployment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
ref: context.sha,
environment: 'review',
auto_merge: false,
required_contexts: []
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for GitHub API calls.

The GitHub API calls lack proper error handling.

             // Create initial deployment comment
+            let comment;
+            try {
               const comment = await github.rest.issues.createComment({
                 owner: context.repo.owner,
                 repo: context.repo.repo,
                 issue_number: process.env.PR_NUMBER,
                 body: '⏳ Initializing deployment...'
               });
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.error(`Failed to create comment: ${error.message}`);
+              throw error;
+            }
             
             // Create GitHub deployment
+            let deployment;
+            try {
               const deployment = await github.rest.repos.createDeployment({
                 owner: context.repo.owner,
                 repo: context.repo.repo,
                 ref: context.sha,
                 environment: 'review',
                 auto_merge: false,
                 required_contexts: []
               });
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.error(`Failed to create deployment: ${error.message}`);
+              throw error;
+            }

             // Create GitHub deployment status
+            try {
               await github.rest.repos.createDeploymentStatus(deploymentStatus);
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.error(`Failed to create deployment status: ${error.message}`);
+              throw error;
+            }

Also applies to: 177-187

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 87-87: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Comment on lines +171 to +173
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const appUrl = process.env.REVIEW_APP_URL;
const workflowUrl = process.env.WORKFLOW_URL;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add validation for REVIEW_APP_URL.

The script uses REVIEW_APP_URL without validating its presence or format.

             const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
             const appUrl = process.env.REVIEW_APP_URL;
+            if (!appUrl) {
+              core.error('REVIEW_APP_URL is not set');
+              process.exit(1);
+            }
+            if (!appUrl.startsWith('http')) {
+              core.error('REVIEW_APP_URL is not a valid URL');
+              process.exit(1);
+            }
             const workflowUrl = process.env.WORKFLOW_URL;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const appUrl = process.env.REVIEW_APP_URL;
const workflowUrl = process.env.WORKFLOW_URL;
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const appUrl = process.env.REVIEW_APP_URL;
if (!appUrl) {
core.error('REVIEW_APP_URL is not set');
process.exit(1);
}
if (!appUrl.startsWith('http')) {
core.error('REVIEW_APP_URL is not a valid URL');
process.exit(1);
}
const workflowUrl = process.env.WORKFLOW_URL;

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/help

@justin808
Copy link
Member Author

/delete-review-app

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (1)

11-17: Consider adding command validation.

While the conditions are correct, consider adding input sanitization for the comment body to prevent potential injection attacks.

     if: |
       github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && 
       github.event.issue.pull_request && 
-      github.event.comment.body == '/help'
+      contains(github.event.comment.body, '/help') && 
+      endsWith(trimSpace(github.event.comment.body), '/help')
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1)

3-3: Simplify the run-name expression.

The current run-name expression is complex and hard to read. Consider breaking it down using a GitHub script step.

-run-name: ${{ (github.event_name == 'pull_request' || (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && github.event.issue.pull_request)) && 'Deploying Review App' || format('Deploying {0} to Staging App', github.ref_name) }}
+run-name: ${{ github.event.pull_request && 'Deploying Review App' || format('Deploying {0} to Staging App', github.ref_name) }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3426aca and 92ad3a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/help-command.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml

[error] 14-14: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 15-15: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 59-59: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml

[error] 26-26: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 27-27: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 61-61: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 77-77: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 96-96: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 99-99: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 104-104: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 107-107: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 115-115: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 127-127: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 157-157: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 188-188: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 213-213: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 224-224: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 226-226: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 237-237: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 245-245: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 252-252: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml

[error] 20-20: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 21-21: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 63-63: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 102-102: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 110-110: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml

90-90: input "github_token" is not defined in action "Delete Control Plane App" defined at "./.github/actions/delete-control-plane-app". available inputs are "app_name", "org"

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/help-command.yml (1)

1-10: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.

The workflow trigger and permissions are correctly configured for handling issue comments and managing responses.

.github/workflows/delete-review-app.yml (1)

13-16: Fix inconsistent secret usage between workflow and step level.

The workflow uses staging-specific secrets but the environment variables use generic names.

.github/workflows/deploy-to-control-plane.yml (4)

41-44: Fix shell script quoting.

The shell script needs proper quoting to prevent word splitting and globbing.


109-124: Add error handling for GitHub API calls.

The GitHub API calls lack proper error handling which could lead to silent failures.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 115-115: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


165-172: Remove undefined input parameter.

The PR_NUMBER input is passed to the build-docker-image action but is not defined in the action's metadata.


209-211: Add validation for REVIEW_APP_URL.

The script uses REVIEW_APP_URL without validating its presence or format.

Comment on lines 19 to 32
steps:
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for help command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
echo "Raw event payload:"
echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Limit exposure of sensitive information in debug logs.

The debug step exposes the raw event payload which might contain sensitive information. Consider filtering the payload before logging.

       run: |
         echo "Debug information for help command:"
         echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
         echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
         echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
-        echo "Raw event payload:"
-        echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'
+        # Log only necessary fields
+        echo "Event type: ${{ github.event.type }}"
+        echo "Repository: ${{ github.repository }}"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
steps:
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for help command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
echo "Raw event payload:"
echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'
steps:
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for help command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
# Log only necessary fields
echo "Event type: ${{ github.event.type }}"
echo "Repository: ${{ github.repository }}"

Comment on lines 33 to 65
- name: Show Available Commands
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const helpMessage = [
'## 📚 Available Commands',
'',
'### `/deploy`',
'Deploys your PR branch to a review environment on Control Plane.',
'- Creates a new review app if one doesn\'t exist',
'- Updates the existing review app if it already exists',
'- Provides a unique URL to preview your changes',
'- Shows build and deployment progress in real-time',
'',
'### `/delete-review-app`',
'Deletes the review app associated with this PR.',
'- Removes all resources from Control Plane',
'- Helpful for cleaning up when you\'re done testing',
'- Can be re-deployed later using `/deploy`',
'',
'### `/help`',
'Shows this help message explaining available commands.',
'',
'---',
'_Note: These commands only work in pull request comments._'
].join('\n');

await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
body: helpMessage
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling for GitHub API calls.

The comment creation lacks error handling which could lead to silent failures.

           script: |
             const helpMessage = [
               // ... existing message construction ...
             ].join('\n');
             
-            await github.rest.issues.createComment({
-              owner: context.repo.owner,
-              repo: context.repo.repo,
-              issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
-              body: helpMessage
-            });
+            try {
+              await github.rest.issues.createComment({
+                owner: context.repo.owner,
+                repo: context.repo.repo,
+                issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
+                body: helpMessage
+              });
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.setFailed(`Failed to create help comment: ${error.message}`);
+            }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Show Available Commands
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const helpMessage = [
'## 📚 Available Commands',
'',
'### `/deploy`',
'Deploys your PR branch to a review environment on Control Plane.',
'- Creates a new review app if one doesn\'t exist',
'- Updates the existing review app if it already exists',
'- Provides a unique URL to preview your changes',
'- Shows build and deployment progress in real-time',
'',
'### `/delete-review-app`',
'Deletes the review app associated with this PR.',
'- Removes all resources from Control Plane',
'- Helpful for cleaning up when you\'re done testing',
'- Can be re-deployed later using `/deploy`',
'',
'### `/help`',
'Shows this help message explaining available commands.',
'',
'---',
'_Note: These commands only work in pull request comments._'
].join('\n');
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
body: helpMessage
});
- name: Show Available Commands
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const helpMessage = [
'## 📚 Available Commands',
'',
'### `/deploy`',
'Deploys your PR branch to a review environment on Control Plane.',
'- Creates a new review app if one doesn\'t exist',
'- Updates the existing review app if it already exists',
'- Provides a unique URL to preview your changes',
'- Shows build and deployment progress in real-time',
'',
'### `/delete-review-app`',
'Deletes the review app associated with this PR.',
'- Removes all resources from Control Plane',
'- Helpful for cleaning up when you\'re done testing',
'- Can be re-deployed later using `/deploy`',
'',
'### `/help`',
'Shows this help message explaining available commands.',
'',
'---',
'_Note: These commands only work in pull request comments._'
].join('\n');
try {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
issue_number: context.payload.issue.number,
body: helpMessage
});
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(`Failed to create help comment: ${error.message}`);
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 59-59: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Comment on lines 26 to 40
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for delete-review-app command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
echo "PR number: $PR_NUMBER"
echo "Raw event payload:"
echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Limit debug information exposure.

Similar to the help command workflow, consider limiting the exposure of sensitive information in debug logs.

         run: |
           echo "Debug information for delete-review-app command:"
           echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
           echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
           echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
           echo "PR number: $PR_NUMBER"
-          echo "Raw event payload:"
-          echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'
+          # Log only necessary fields
+          echo "Event type: ${{ github.event.type }}"
+          echo "Repository: ${{ github.repository }}"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for delete-review-app command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
echo "PR number: $PR_NUMBER"
echo "Raw event payload:"
echo '${{ toJSON(github.event) }}'
- name: Debug Trigger Conditions
env:
EVENT_NAME: ${{ github.event_name }}
IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != '' }}
COMMENT: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
run: |
echo "Debug information for delete-review-app command:"
echo "Event name: $EVENT_NAME"
echo "Is PR: $IS_PR"
echo "Comment body: $COMMENT"
echo "PR number: $PR_NUMBER"
# Log only necessary fields
echo "Event type: ${{ github.event.type }}"
echo "Repository: ${{ github.repository }}"

Comment on lines 94 to 116
- name: Update Delete Status
if: always()
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const success = '${{ job.status }}' === 'success';
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${process.env.CPLN_ORG}/workloads/${process.env.APP_NAME}`;

const message = success
? '✅ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' was successfully deleted'
: [
'❌ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' failed to be deleted',
'',
'[View in Control Plane Console](' + cpConsoleUrl + ')'
].join('\n');

await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
comment_id: ${{ fromJSON(steps.init-delete.outputs.result).commentId }},
body: message
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and validation for status updates.

The status update process should handle potential errors and validate the deletion success.

           script: |
+            try {
               const success = '${{ job.status }}' === 'success';
               const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
               const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${process.env.CPLN_ORG}/workloads/${process.env.APP_NAME}`;
               
               const message = success
                 ? '✅ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' was successfully deleted'
                 : [
                     '❌ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' failed to be deleted',
                     '',
                     '[View in Control Plane Console](' + cpConsoleUrl + ')'
                   ].join('\n');
               
               await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
                 owner: context.repo.owner,
                 repo: context.repo.repo,
                 comment_id: ${{ fromJSON(steps.init-delete.outputs.result).commentId }},
                 body: message
               });
+            } catch (error) {
+              core.setFailed(`Failed to update status: ${error.message}`);
+            }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Update Delete Status
if: always()
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const success = '${{ job.status }}' === 'success';
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${process.env.CPLN_ORG}/workloads/${process.env.APP_NAME}`;
const message = success
? '✅ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' was successfully deleted'
: [
'❌ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' failed to be deleted',
'',
'[View in Control Plane Console](' + cpConsoleUrl + ')'
].join('\n');
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
comment_id: ${{ fromJSON(steps.init-delete.outputs.result).commentId }},
body: message
});
- name: Update Delete Status
if: always()
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
try {
const success = '${{ job.status }}' === 'success';
const prNumber = process.env.PR_NUMBER;
const cpConsoleUrl = `https://console.cpln.io/org/${process.env.CPLN_ORG}/workloads/${process.env.APP_NAME}`;
const message = success
? '✅ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' was successfully deleted'
: [
'❌ Review app for PR #' + prNumber + ' failed to be deleted',
'',
'[View in Control Plane Console](' + cpConsoleUrl + ')'
].join('\n');
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
comment_id: ${{ fromJSON(steps.init-delete.outputs.result).commentId }},
body: message
});
} catch (error) {
core.setFailed(`Failed to update status: ${error.message}`);
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 102-102: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 110-110: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

🚀 Deploying to Control Plane...

⏳ Waiting for deployment to be ready...

📋 View Deploy Logs

🎮 Control Plane Console for Review App with PR #615

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Deploying to Control Plane...

Waiting for deployment to be ready...

View Deploy Logs

Control Plane Console for Review App with PR #615

@justin808 justin808 merged commit 5a01718 into master Jan 26, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@justin808 justin808 deleted the justin808-testing-2025-01 branch January 26, 2025 08:36
This was referenced Jan 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant