-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
date-time bug #20
Comments
I'm a bit confused. I just upgraded the
It seems that it still doesn't validate the date-time correctly. |
Me too... I thought it had been fixed with version 3: ajv-validator/ajv-formats#55 |
As discussed today. |
As described in ajv-validator/ajv-formats#55 the RFC 3339 requires by ABNF and description the use of
is not changing the ABNF but telling a potential representation in the GUI resp. pointing to ISO 8601. Therefore, the The following examples are invalid:
The following examples are fully valid:
The following examples are valid but should not be produced by Secvisogram:
Please provide an appropriate PR to |
@domachine Maybe worth having a look again? I found this PR: BSI-Bund/secvisogram#76 |
The same bug as secvisogram/secvisogram#216 (see ajv-validator/ajv-formats#55) applies here. We should use ajv-validator/ajv-formats#49 version 3.0.0 even if it is not stable yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: