Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unpin python-dateutil dependency #192

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2019

Conversation

lukpueh
Copy link
Member

@lukpueh lukpueh commented Nov 11, 2019

There is no reason to strictly pin python-dateutil to 2.8.0. On the contrary, pinning dependencies is prone to introduce dependency conflicts (especially in downstream releases).

This was most likely a copy-paste mistake related to the practice of pinning dependencies in dev-requirements.txt.

This is a quick fix for python-dateutil. A more comprehensive dependency handling revision may be performed with #182.

There is no reason to strictly pin python-dateutil to 2.8.0. On
the contrary, pinning dependency is prone to introduce dependency
conflicts (especially in downstream releases).

This was most likely a copy-paste mistake related to the practice
of pinning dependencies in dev-requirements.txt.

This is a quick fix for python-dateutil. A more comprehensive
dependency handling revision may be performed with
secure-systems-lab#182
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 99.9% when pulling 21a9ad2 on lukpueh:unpin-dateutil into dfd4c65 on secure-systems-lab:master.

@SantiagoTorres SantiagoTorres merged commit 72bb8ed into secure-systems-lab:master Nov 11, 2019
@lukpueh lukpueh mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants