Backport "Fix enclosingClass from returning refinement classes" to 3.3 LTS #49
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Looking at how i20952 is compiled, the call
ctx.owner.enclosingClass.derivesFrom(sym.owner)
in SuperAccessors (that I moved to ProtectedAccessors) accidentally
fails, because the refinement class returned as the enclosing class of
`val prog` doesn't derive from SuperClass. But if the enclosing class
of `prog` returned is `trait Child` then no super accessor call is
necessary.
[Cherry-picked 15922f9]
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backports scala#21411 to the 3.3.6.
PR submitted by the release tooling.
[skip ci]