standardize build.sbt and build.sh #114
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adopt tweaks from scala-xml (our "standard" module) and scala-library-next (the most-recently-set-up one) here the main change is to adopt the new build.sh style where we get rid of the special tag stuff for back-publishing I've also chosen to get rid of `.withoutSuffixFor(JVMPlatform)` because I don't like it, IMO it makes it too easy to confuse the root project with the JVM project
|
this is also a test of the migration to travis-ci.org to travis-ci.com, as per scala/scala-dev#728 |
|
merging on the fast track so I can get #113 done |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
adopt tweaks from scala-xml (our "standard" module) and scala-library-next (the most-recently-set-up one) here
the main change is to adopt the new build.sh style where we get rid of the special tag stuff for back-publishing
I've also chosen to get rid of
.withoutSuffixFor(JVMPlatform)because I don't like it, IMO it makes it too easy to confuse the root project with the JVM project