Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency vitest to v2.1.9 #8489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
vitest (source) ^2.1.8 -> ^2.1.9 age adoption passing confidence
vitest (source) 2.1.8 -> 2.1.9 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v2.1.9

Compare Source

   🚨 Breaking Changes
   🚀 Features
   🐞 Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 3am on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners February 4, 2025 11:56
@renovate renovate bot requested review from ricokahler and removed request for a team February 4, 2025 11:56
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge February 4, 2025 11:56
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 4, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 4, 2025 0:04am
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 4, 2025 0:04am
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 4, 2025 0:04am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 4, 2025 0:04am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 4, 2025 0:04am

@juice49 juice49 requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team and ricokahler February 4, 2025 11:57
Copy link

Updated dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected] 🔁 npm/[email protected] Transitive: filesystem, network, shell, unsafe +85 11.6 MB antfu, oreanno, patak, ...1 more

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 4, 2025 12:07 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (1) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 5s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 1m 19s 5 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 51s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 6s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 29s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 1s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 12s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 26s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 43s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Tue, 04 Feb 2025 12:09:17 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 26.3 efps (38ms) 26.0 efps (39ms) +1ms (+1.3%)
article (body) 71.9 efps (14ms) 67.8 efps (15ms) +1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 27.0 efps (37ms) 27.4 efps (37ms) -1ms (-1.4%)
article (string inside array) 23.8 efps (42ms) 25.0 efps (40ms) -2ms (-4.8%)
recipe (name) 50.0 efps (20ms) 52.6 efps (19ms) -1ms (-5.0%)
recipe (description) 55.6 efps (18ms) 55.6 efps (18ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 18.5 efps (54ms) 20.0 efps (50ms) -4ms (-7.4%)
synthetic (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 19.6 efps (51ms) +1ms (+2.0%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 46ms 67ms 416ms 806ms 11.1s
article (body) 14ms 16ms 25ms 135ms 67ms 4.9s
article (string inside object) 37ms 39ms 41ms 151ms 127ms 6.6s
article (string inside array) 42ms 43ms 48ms 72ms 124ms 6.7s
recipe (name) 20ms 22ms 24ms 42ms 0ms 7.4s
recipe (description) 18ms 18ms 20ms 35ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 10ms 21ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 54ms 57ms 75ms 313ms 1072ms 12.5s
synthetic (string inside object) 50ms 55ms 68ms 446ms 830ms 8.6s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 45ms 70ms 437ms 924ms 11.0s
article (body) 15ms 18ms 29ms 85ms 179ms 5.2s
article (string inside object) 37ms 38ms 50ms 143ms 275ms 6.4s
article (string inside array) 40ms 43ms 45ms 68ms 127ms 7.1s
recipe (name) 19ms 21ms 24ms 49ms 0ms 6.7s
recipe (description) 18ms 19ms 21ms 31ms 0ms 4.4s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 7ms 8ms 16ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 50ms 53ms 63ms 320ms 663ms 12.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 51ms 52ms 65ms 480ms 991ms 8.1s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into next with commit 60f2503 Feb 4, 2025
55 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch February 4, 2025 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant