-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
shim Apple's futex primitives #4142
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This is necessary to unblock rust-lang/rust#122408. The documentation for these is available [here](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/os/os_sync_wait_on_address?language=objc). Because the futex wait operations (`os_sync_wait_on_address` et al.) return the number of remaining waiters after returning, this required some changes to the common futex infrastructure, which I've changed to take a callback instead of precalculating the return values.
Thanks for the PR! I just left for a 1-week business trip and will have to catch up with stuff when I am back so it could take a bit before I can take a closer look. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (possibly 489a487) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot! Overall approach looks great, but I have a bunch of questions and comments. :)
/// * On a signal, `retval_succ` is called with the number of waiters on the | ||
/// futex and its result is written to `dest`. | ||
/// * On a timeout, `retval_timeout` is written to `dest` and `errno_timeout` | ||
/// is set as the last error. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most of the variables referenced here do not exist any more.
} | ||
|ecx, unblock: UnblockKind| match unblock { | ||
UnblockKind::Ready => { | ||
ecx.write_scalar(Scalar::from_target_isize(0, ecx), &dest) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ecx.write_scalar(Scalar::from_target_isize(0, ecx), &dest) | |
ecx.write_int(0, &dest) |
|this, unblock: UnblockKind| { | ||
match unblock { | ||
UnblockKind::Ready => { | ||
this.write_scalar(Scalar::from_i32(1), &dest) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this.write_scalar(Scalar::from_i32(1), &dest) | |
this.write_int(1, &dest) |
} | ||
UnblockKind::TimedOut => { | ||
this.set_last_error(IoError::WindowsError("ERROR_TIMEOUT"))?; | ||
this.write_scalar(Scalar::from_i32(0), &dest) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this.write_scalar(Scalar::from_i32(0), &dest) | |
this.write_int(0, &dest) |
@@ -216,6 +224,53 @@ pub trait EvalContextExt<'tcx>: crate::MiriInterpCxExt<'tcx> { | |||
this.write_scalar(res, dest)?; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
"os_sync_wait_on_address" => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"os_sync_wait_on_address" => { | |
// Futex primitives | |
"os_sync_wait_on_address" => { |
fn wake_nobody() { | ||
let futex = 0; | ||
|
||
// Wake 1 waiter. Expect zero waiters woken up, as nobody is waiting. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
// Wake 1 waiter. Expect zero waiters woken up, as nobody is waiting. | |
// Wake 1 waiter. Expect ENOENT, as nobody is waiting. |
), | ||
-1 | ||
); | ||
assert_eq!(io::Error::last_os_error().raw_os_error().unwrap(), libc::ENOENT); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So this is the same error as "nobody is waiting"? Interesting.
// Add 200ms (note: this only works under miri because it uses nanosecond units for | ||
// mach_absolute_time). | ||
deadline += 200_000_000; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sounds like we are doing something wrong, then?
t.join().unwrap(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn param_mismatch() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add comments pointing out what the mismatch is in each case.
size_of::<i32>(), | ||
libc::OS_SYNC_WAIT_ON_ADDRESS_NONE, | ||
), | ||
0, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add a test where wait_on_address returns something non-zero (since there are more waiters).
This is necessary to unblock rust-lang/rust#122408. The documentation for these is available here.
Because the futex wait operations (
os_sync_wait_on_address
et al.) return the number of remaining waiters after returning, this required some changes to the common futex infrastructure, which I've changed to take a callback instead of precalculating the return values.