Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: onboarding customerio segment #1853

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shrouti1507
Copy link
Contributor

@shrouti1507 shrouti1507 commented Jan 2, 2025

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

Write a brief explainer on your code changes.

What is the related Linear task?

Resolves INT-XXX

Please explain the objectives of your changes below

Put down any required details on the broader aspect of your changes. If there are any dependent changes, mandatorily mention them here

Any changes to existing capabilities/behaviour, mention the reason & what are the changes ?

N/A

Any new dependencies introduced with this change?

N/A

Any new checks got introduced or modified in test suites. Please explain the changes.

N/A


Developer checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project

  • No breaking changes are being introduced.

  • All related docs linked with the PR?

  • All changes manually tested?

  • Any documentation changes needed with this change?

  • I have executed schemaGenerator tests and updated schema if needed

  • Are sensitive fields marked as secret in definition config?

  • My test cases and placeholders use only masked/sample values for sensitive fields

  • Is the PR limited to 10 file changes & one task?

Reviewer checklist

  • Is the type of change in the PR title appropriate as per the changes?

  • Verified that there are no credentials or confidential data exposed with the changes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added configuration support for Customer.io Segment destination.
    • Introduced comprehensive UI and schema configurations for integration.
    • Implemented connection and consent management settings.
    • Enabled advanced destination-specific configuration options.
  • Documentation

    • Provided detailed configuration guidelines for Customer.io Segment integration.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Walkthrough

A new destination configuration for Customer.io Segment has been introduced, involving three JSON configuration files: a database configuration, a schema validation file, and a user interface configuration. These files collectively define the integration settings, connection parameters, and UI representation for the Customer.io Segment destination. The configuration supports advanced features like consent management, connection modes, and detailed validation rules for various input parameters.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/db-config.json Added new destination configuration with support for audience creation, visual mapper, synchronization behaviors, and warehouse connection modes.
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/schema.json Introduced schema validation for configuration properties including site ID, API keys, consent management, and connection modes.
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json Created UI configuration defining connection settings, destination settings, and consent management templates.

Poem

🐰 In the realm of data's grand design,
Customer.io Segment now shall shine!
With configs crisp and schemas tight,
Our rabbit engineers take flight!
Connecting worlds with coded might! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54d2d3c and eeea447.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2318a6f) to head (eeea447).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #1853   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines           53        53           
  Branches         7         7           
=========================================
  Hits            53        53           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/db-config.json (1)

5-11: Consider adding data validation feature flag

The destination handles sensitive API keys and customer data. Consider adding the validateDataFormat feature flag for enhanced data validation.

     "features": [
-      "vdm-next"
+      "vdm-next",
+      "validateDataFormat"
     ],
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/schema.json (1)

74-80: Add pattern validation for resolutionStrategy

The resolutionStrategy field lacks pattern validation for environment variables.

Add pattern validation:

       "resolutionStrategy": {
         "type": "string",
-        "enum": ["and", "or"]
+        "enum": ["and", "or"],
+        "pattern": "(^\\{\\{.*\\|\\|(.*)\\}\\}$)|(^env[.].+)|^(and|or)$"
       }
src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json (2)

138-146: Simplify duplicate feature flag conditions

The feature flags array contains duplicate entries with different values.

Simplify the conditions:

            "featureFlags": [
-              {
-                "configKey": "AMP_enable-gcm",
-                "value": false
-              },
-              {
-                "configKey": "AMP_enable-gcm"
-              }
+              {
+                "configKey": "AMP_enable-gcm",
+                "value": false
+              }
            ],

22-22: Standardize placeholder format

The placeholder format is inconsistent across fields. Some use "e.g:" while others use "e.g.".

Standardize the format:

-                    "placeholder": "e.g: 88f02580XXXXXXXcf18",
+                    "placeholder": "e.g., 88f02580XXXXXXXcf18",

Also applies to: 32-32, 42-42

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b1bd34 and ff24e30.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/db-config.json (1 hunks)
  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/schema.json (1 hunks)
  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json (1 hunks)

"ketchConsentPurposes"
]
},
"secretKeys": ["appApiKey", "apiKey"]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Add siteId to secretKeys array for consistent security configuration

Based on the UI configuration, siteId is marked with "secret": true in the UI, but is missing from the secretKeys array in the db-config.json. This inconsistency should be fixed by adding siteId to maintain proper security handling across the configuration.

  • src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/db-config.json: Add siteId to the secretKeys array
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify consistency of secret keys configuration

The secretKeys array includes appApiKey and apiKey but excludes siteId, which is marked as secret in the UI configuration.

Add siteId to the secretKeys array:

-    "secretKeys": ["appApiKey", "apiKey"]
+    "secretKeys": ["appApiKey", "apiKey", "siteId"]

Let me verify the consistency between secret keys configuration and UI fields by searching through the codebase.


Let me search specifically for UI configuration that marks the siteId as secret.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Error: No shell scripts found


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for UI configuration files related to customerio_segment
fd customerio_segment --type f

# Search for siteId configuration in the found files
rg "siteId" --type json

Length of output: 8732


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check UI configuration for customerio_segment
cat src/configurations/destinations/customerio_segment/ui-config.json

Length of output: 8861

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants