-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replace deprecated pose2d with pose #64
replace deprecated pose2d with pose #64
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Kenji Brameld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kenji Brameld <[email protected]>
This seems perfectly reasonable. However, I'd like to hold off until I re-engage with folks on ros2/common_interfaces#179 to see if we can't keep the message around. |
Signed-off-by: Kenji Brameld <[email protected]>
@SteveMacenski updated accordingly. |
Signed-off-by: Kenji Brameld <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@Kukanani do you want to take a look |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I love how fast y'all are. One nit to be explicit with documentation, otherwise, looks great.
Co-authored-by: Adam Allevato <[email protected]>
Pose2D is deprecated in geometry_msgs, so use Pose.
Alternative would be to have
x
,y
,theta
as fields ofBoundingBox2d.msg
and not depend on geometry_msgs/Pose2D.Resolves: #65