updated docs related to the archival of the package on CRAN.

README.Rmd

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ knitr::opts_chunk$set(
 )
 ```
 
-[![cran checks](https://badges.cranchecks.info/worst/rsnps.svg)](https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rsnps.html)
+
 [![R build status](https://github.com/ropensci/rsnps/workflows/R-CMD-check/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ropensci/rsnps/actions)
 [![Build status](https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/d2lv98726u6t9ut5/branch/master)](https://ci.appveyor.com/project/sckott/rsnps/branch/master/)
 [![Codecov test coverage](https://codecov.io/gh/ropensci/rsnps/branch/master/graph/badge.svg)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ropensci/rsnps?branch=master)

README.md

@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
 
 # rsnps
 
-[![cran
-checks](https://badges.cranchecks.info/worst/rsnps.svg)](https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rsnps.html)
 [![R build
 status](https://github.com/ropensci/rsnps/workflows/R-CMD-check/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ropensci/rsnps/actions)
 [![Build

cran-comments.md

@@ -7,11 +7,31 @@
 
 ## R CMD check results
 
+I think this package was archived because a re-submission  was submitted with the
+same release (0.6.0) as the release that I was trying to correct (0.6.0). This 
+submission (0.6.1) attempts to correct this in line with CRAN policy (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html).
+
 There were no ERRORs or WARNINGs. 
 
-There is 3 NOTEs.  
+There are 4 NOTEs.
 
-1. Two that are only found on Windows (Server 2022, R-devel 64-bit): 
+
+1. One related to the archival of this package:
+```
+Maintainer: 'Julia Gustavsen <[email protected]>'
+
+New submission
+
+Package was archived on CRAN
+
+CRAN repository db overrides:
+  X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2023-07-09 for policy violation.
+  
+On Internet access.
+
+```
+
+2. Two that are only found on Windows (Server 2022, R-devel 64-bit): 
 
 ```
 * checking for detritus in the temp directory ... NOTE
@@ -20,7 +40,7 @@ Found the following files/directories:
 ```
 As noted in [R-hub issue #503](https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/503), this could be due to a bug/crash in MiKTeX and can likely be ignored.
 
-2. The second is 
+3. The third is 
 
 ```
 * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE
@@ -30,7 +50,7 @@ Found the following files/directories:
 
 As noted in [R-hub issue #560](https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/560), this seems to be an Rhub issue and so can likely be ignored. 
 
-3. A third that is found with *Fedora Linux, R-devel, clang, gfortran* and *Ubuntu Linux 20.04.1 LTS, R-release, GCC*
+4. A fourth that is found with *Fedora Linux, R-devel, clang, gfortran* and *Ubuntu Linux 20.04.1 LTS, R-release, GCC*
 
 ```
 * checking HTML version of manual ... NOTE
@@ -41,21 +61,9 @@ This also seems to be a recurring issue on Rhub [R-hub issue #560](https://githu
 
 ## revdepcheck results
 
-We checked 1 reverse dependencies (0 from CRAN + 1 from Bioconductor), comparing R CMD check results across CRAN and dev versions of this package.
-
- * We saw 0 new problems
- * We failed to check 0 packages
-
-
-4. A fourth note is related to the resubmission of the update following some failing tests on CRAN
+Not available for this submission the package was archived. 
 
-```
-* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [10s] NOTE
-Maintainer: 'Julia Gustavsen <[email protected]>'
 
-Days since last update: 4
-
-```
 
 ---