Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changed pgp_add_time to use enum instead of char* parameter. #233

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 20, 2017

Conversation

ni4
Copy link
Contributor

@ni4 ni4 commented Jun 19, 2017

Fixes #219 , mostly for better code readability.

@ni4 ni4 requested review from dewyatt and kriskwiatkowski June 19, 2017 17:02
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #233 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 55.55%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #233      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.22%   44.22%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        9089     9092       +3     
  Branches       16       16              
==========================================
+ Hits         4020     4021       +1     
- Misses       5064     5066       +2     
  Partials        5        5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lib/packet-key.c 76.66% <100%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
src/lib/signature.c 38.96% <46.66%> (-0.19%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8673a5d...9100708. Read the comment docs.

@kriskwiatkowski
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@kriskwiatkowski kriskwiatkowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small step in right direction

@ni4
Copy link
Contributor Author

ni4 commented Jun 20, 2017

What policy do we have? May I merge it now, or wait for @dewyatt approval as well?

@dewyatt
Copy link
Contributor

dewyatt commented Jun 20, 2017

@ronaldtse Do you want to formalize a PR review process (see @ni4 comment above)? For example, require 2 approvals on each PR, or something like that (you can enforce a policy via github too, of course).

@dewyatt dewyatt merged commit cdc9af5 into master Jun 20, 2017
@ni4 ni4 deleted the ni4-219-pgp_add_time-refactoring branch June 20, 2017 13:44
@ni4
Copy link
Contributor Author

ni4 commented Jun 20, 2017

Thanks! Yeah, possibly it would be easier/more organized to have some simple formal rules, like naming of the branches, number of approves needed for the merge and so on.

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

Yes @dewyatt let's formalize a policy to require two approvals to merge, and the other typical rules we should follow, could you help add them to the Dev Guide?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants