Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
chore: add semantic-release
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
renatorib committed Aug 9, 2024
1 parent 6078c6f commit 734d0f9
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 1,775 additions and 5 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The ideia is to create a different build output on development that works like a
> Otherwise it will **not** bring any benefit, unless you do manual symlinks through your local repos.
> **TL;DR**
> Add `{ "stub": "ts-stub --clear" }` script to all pacakges and execute all at once.
> Add `{ "stub": "ts-stub --clear" }` script to all packages and execute all at once.
<br>

Expand All @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ pnpm add -D ts-stub

<br>

### `2` Add a separate build script to stubbing your pacakges
### `2` Add a separate build script to stubbing your packages

<kbd>packages/a/package.json</kbd>

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ They also do build stubbing with the <kbd>--stub</kbd> flag.

**1. Convenience**

> If you already use _unbuild_ to bundle your pacakges, there is **absolutely no reason** for you to use _ts-stub_.
> If you already use _unbuild_ to bundle your packages, there is **absolutely no reason** for you to use _ts-stub_.
> Just go with _unbuild --stub_!
**2. ESM**
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions package.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
"comment-hole": "^0.1.1",
"import-meta-resolve": "^4.1.0",
"prettier": "^3.3.3",
"semantic-release": "^24.0.0",
"tsup": "^8.2.4",
"typescript": "^5.5.4",
"vitest": "^2.0.5"
Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit 734d0f9

Please sign in to comment.