Adding Spotahome full remote positions

[AlvYuste]

Currently, there is one open for Software Development Engineer: https://rent.spotahome.com/work-with-us/post?gh_jid=5074410002

[alexpdp7]

Remote positions are not superclear from the main job listing, but good enough for me!

[uesteibar]

I don't think this matches the criteria we've set though. In the linked page it never states whether a position is remote or not, and there's no way to filter for remote jobs 😕 I'm confused as why we accepted this when we've rejected very similar PRs (see #29).

[alexpdp7]

Hmmm, yes, this might be worth thinking more about. The difference with #29 is that inside the offer it seems to be clear the position is remote:

We all work full-remote from home, but we have an open space in sunny Madrid available for anyone to come.

, while (IIRC), Genially didn't have that. I think we might have some other listings with similar problems.

@AlvYuste , could you nudge your company to be a bit more clear?

@uesteibar I'm happy to revert the commit. I suggest we ping @acroca for his "vote" and decide (if they don't improve the listing, of course!). Personally, I think this particular case is fine (if not optimal)... but if you two agree, or if Albert doesn't vote, let's rollback? (we have a ton of companies now, so I guess we can start being a bit more strict...)

[alexpdp7]

(reopened #29 as I noticed maybe their LinkedIn jobs listing is good enough- there it talks about 100% remote [although their main careers website in their homepage doesn't...]).

Thanks for being on point, @uesteibar ...

[uesteibar]

sounds good to me, let's wait for @acroca's input on this. My personal stance is that I'd rather not add listings that can't be searched for remote positions (at least with a cmd/ctrl + f search)

[alexpdp7]

As @acroca might be busy...

What you say makes sense, but I think we should consider how many offers are in the listing, and which are remote. If a company has a ton of offers and they are 50/50 remote or less, then our users might find it painful to find the remote offers. In this case, they right now have a single IT-related offer, and it's clear inside that it's remote, so I think users of this repo might prefer the company being listed than not listed.

If you want to remove them, I can remove them myself (I kinda wanted acroca to weigh in and break the tie, so I was lazy and I didn't make this argument before- sorry about that).

[uesteibar]

if you wanna keep them, that's fine for me. I would just try and be consistent with the criteria going forward.

[acroca]

Are all the positions in that company remote? If so, I'd expect it to be mentioned at least in the job description.

If all the Spanish jobs are remote, and it's mentioned in the description, I'd say it's fine to keep it.

If some are remote and some are not, I'd ask them to make it clear if something is remote or not, as a potential applicant I'd be fine reading the job to figure out if it's remote or not, but has to be clear.

[alexpdp7]

I started working on collecting data about our listing in #54 (comment) to take those decisions with some information. I suggest we continue the discussion there.