Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

label ceph svg correctly if datapool name is empty #2523

Merged

Conversation

leelavg
Copy link
Contributor

@leelavg leelavg commented Mar 25, 2024

when the datapool in cephfs is empty (aka default) the constructed resource label value ends with hyphen(-) which isn't valid. This commit adds the suffix only if the datapool isn't empty (ref #2517)

add rbac for provider-sa to query ceph radosnamespace (ref #2518)

@leelavg leelavg force-pushed the fix-storageclassrequest branch from 06dddb6 to 4e4e220 Compare March 25, 2024 08:22
Copy link
Member

@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
@leelavg leelavg force-pushed the fix-storageclassrequest branch from 4e4e220 to 3a6dbda Compare March 25, 2024 10:22
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Madhu-1 Madhu-1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Mar 25, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 25, 2024
@leelavg leelavg force-pushed the fix-storageclassrequest branch from 3a6dbda to 1e63ec0 Compare March 25, 2024 12:24
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
@leelavg
Copy link
Contributor Author

leelavg commented Mar 25, 2024

rebased to pick CI changes.

@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Mar 25, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
@leelavg
Copy link
Contributor Author

leelavg commented Mar 25, 2024

/test ocs-operator-bundle-e2e-aws

1 similar comment
@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Mar 25, 2024

/test ocs-operator-bundle-e2e-aws

@leelavg leelavg force-pushed the fix-storageclassrequest branch from 1e63ec0 to 8bdc052 Compare March 25, 2024 17:54
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
@leelavg
Copy link
Contributor Author

leelavg commented Mar 25, 2024

rebased.

@nb-ohad
Copy link
Contributor

nb-ohad commented Mar 25, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 25, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: leelavg, Madhu-1, nb-ohad

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 9d387da into red-hat-storage:main Mar 25, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants