ci: split tests for local / db [vol.2]

[Borda]

copy of #142, see: #142 (comment)

cc: @shaypal5

[shaypal5]

Thank you! Sorry for the bother.

[Borda]

Thank you! Sorry for the bother.

no problem, it can happen 🐰

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d19b3cf) 99.40% compared to head (d35a27b) 99.60%.

❗ Current head d35a27b differs from pull request most recent head 9db92d9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9db92d9 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #143      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.40%   99.60%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         508      508              
  Branches       88       88              
==========================================
+ Hits          505      506       +1     
+ Misses          2        1       -1     
  Partials        1        1              

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d19b3cf...9db92d9. Read the comment docs.

[shaypal5]

pytest seems to be angry with the "NOT mongo".
The mongo marker is declared as required.
Maybe a lowercase "not"?
@Borda

[Borda]

pytest seems to be angry with the "NOT mongo".
The mongo marker is declared as required.
Maybe a lowercase "not"?

not sure I was using NOT without any issue, lets try it :)

[Borda]

@shaypal5 seems some locals are still failing, mind have look, also feel free to push changes directly to this PR 🐿️

[shaypal5]

Ok, we're upping our game:

1. I've pulled this into an origin dev branch with the name split-tests.
2. I've invited you to the cachier organization and to the group of collaborators, which will give you a write access to this repo.
3. I've protected the master branch, requiring an approved PR to merge into it (and disabling pushes to it, etc.).

I wanted to require some checks to pass before merging, and when trying to select one from the list, it made me realize the current matricization of the the test job across different platforms make Github consider them as a separate checks, which is what has been annoying you in the PR conversation. The upside is that all such builds run in parallel. Please take this into consideration when suggesting an alternative; perhaps this can be collapsed somehow just for the conversation view's sake.

Anyway, from now on, please work directly on dev branches of this repo and not your fork; you'll now be able to get your contributions tests directly against the live MongoDB server I've set up on the MongoDB Atlas platform on every push to your dev branches! :)

[Borda]

Anyway, from now on, please work directly on dev branches of this repo and not your fork; you'll now be able to get your contributions tests directly against the live MongoDB server I've set up on the MongoDB Atlas platform on every push to your dev branches! :)

Thank you and appreciate you granted me this privilege!
there is one last PR #140 coming from my fork, shall we keep it or port it?

[shaypal5]

Let's port it.
And there's already a PR waiting for your approval. :)