-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add: new blog post - czi funding announcement #305
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added my thoughts - mostly grammatical and flow suggestions!
empowerment enables open science to reach its full potential. | ||
|
||
### Open source maintainers need more support | ||
Despite the importance of open source software and inclusion to fundamental |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not entirely clear what we're trying to say here. What's throwing me is the phrase "and inclusion"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i hear you. I think the rewrite goal was to talk about
- how open source is important to open science
- inclusion is important to both
maybe there is a way to make that more clear? there are papers about the importance of dei in science and team work in general. but thing link of ideas is a bit tricky
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok i implemented a minor fix and just dropped the inclusion as it really didn't make sense there!
### Open source maintainers need more support | ||
Despite the importance of open source software and inclusion to fundamental | ||
open science principles, open source maintainers do not get the support they | ||
need. Maintainers need both institutional and community support in learning |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need. Maintainers need both institutional and community support in learning | |
Maintainers need both institutional and community support in learning | |
and engaging in open source software development, as well as in maintaining tools and interacting | |
with the broad user base that uses these tools in support of open science. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you help me understand the intended change here @kierisi so i can apply it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh! yes, for some reason it wouldn't let me select more than a single line for review. so what's showing up in green are my suggested changes, but it's not showing up as a diff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh interesting! maybe we can look at that together to see why :) sometimes the github gui can be a bit quirky!
ok!! i think this should be ready to go :) i'll rename locally and we can still accept minor edits with an intended publish date of next week when we can back from the holiday! |
Fix: install gems locally Fix: install gems locally Fix: install gems locally Fix: another try
Co-authored-by: Jesse Mostipak <[email protected]> Update _posts/2023-12-29-czi-funds-pyopensci-2024.md Co-authored-by: Jesse Mostipak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jesse Mostipak <[email protected]> Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: Jesse Mostipak <[email protected]> Fix: minor edits after review Fix: Rename for jan 3 publication Fix: Rename for jan 3 publication
NOTE: This blog post needs to be renamed before merging so we can use the live preview feature setup here.