We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
interp
Update: This was actually caused by JuliaGeometry/Rotations.jl#198, and is fixed by #8.
Example:
import PoseComposition as PC import Rotations orn1 = Rotations.RotMatrix{3}([ 0.9999999999999996 -6.842277657836019e-49 3.138284443744863e-81; 6.842277657836019e-49 0.9999999999999996 -9.173215705886437e-33; 3.138284443744863e-81 9.173215705886437e-33 0.9999999999999996]) orn2 = Rotations.RotMatrix{3}([0.9999999999999993 0.0 0.0; 0.0 0.9999999999999993 0.0; 0.0 0.0 0.9999999999999993]) PC.interp(PC.Pose([0, 0, 0], orn1), PC.Pose([0, 0, 0], orn2), 1/6)
On my laptop, this gives
Pose⟨pos=[0.0, 0.0, 0.0], orientation=(w=1.0, x=3.822173210786016e-33, y=-2.3408381773461e-97, z=2.8509490240983425e-49)⟩
On the EC2 instance here, it gives
ERROR: DimensionMismatch("No precise constructor for Rotations.Rotation{3, T} where T found. Length of input was 9.")
I should check in more detail that this error is really coming from NaNs. Assuming yes, then the fix is probably to replace this exact-equality check
PoseComposition.jl/src/PoseComposition.jl
Lines 296 to 300 in 4706396
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Attempt to fix #5
6ce1ae4
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Update: This was actually caused by JuliaGeometry/Rotations.jl#198, and is fixed by #8.
Example:
On my laptop, this gives
On the EC2 instance here, it gives
I should check in more detail that this error is really coming from NaNs. Assuming yes, then the fix is probably to replace this exact-equality check
PoseComposition.jl/src/PoseComposition.jl
Lines 296 to 300 in 4706396
with an approximate-equality check.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: