Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1670 introduce a common st command superclass #1671

Conversation

Ducasse
Copy link
Contributor

@Ducasse Ducasse commented Nov 26, 2024

  • Sorting command into NewTools and
  • other default presenters

@estebanlm
Copy link
Member

you cannot do an "St" (which would be newtools dependent) superclass in spec. There is a layer violation there.

@Ducasse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ducasse commented Nov 27, 2024

But after we will move the commands St to NewTools.
Keeping the current names is not nice. Now you can drop the PR because I lost time for this and I'm not in the mood to lose more time.

It loosk in Pharo we put extra luxury to create rules that force us to spend more time on not exciting and interesting issues.

@Ducasse Ducasse closed this Dec 25, 2024
@Ducasse Ducasse deleted the 1670-Introduce-a-common-stCommand-superclass branch December 25, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants