Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test for checkMetadata function #4

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Add test for checkMetadata function #4

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

kavir1698
Copy link
Contributor

@kavir1698 kavir1698 commented Feb 26, 2024

Once this test is merged, I will refactor the function and add checks to address #9

datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kavir1698 kavir1698 marked this pull request as draft March 6, 2024 09:41
@kavir1698 kavir1698 force-pushed the checkMetadata_test branch from c5b3334 to 629d072 Compare March 22, 2024 12:24
@kavir1698 kavir1698 requested a review from minottic March 22, 2024 15:09
@kavir1698 kavir1698 marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2024 15:11
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata.go Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/export_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
go.mod Show resolved Hide resolved
datasetIngestor/checkMetadata_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@minottic minottic self-requested a review March 26, 2024 12:26
@kavir1698
Copy link
Contributor Author

kavir1698 commented Mar 26, 2024

There is one change request from @sbliven that's blocking the merge, but I can't find it 🤔

@minottic minottic requested a review from sbliven March 26, 2024 13:33
@minottic
Copy link
Member

Spencer has to approve the changes were made, otherwise it's blocked

Copy link
Member

@sbliven sbliven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure what the change I requested was, but this looks fine. Good tests.

@kavir1698 kavir1698 merged commit 17bbf51 into main Mar 27, 2024
2 checks passed
@kavir1698 kavir1698 deleted the checkMetadata_test branch March 27, 2024 09:49
kavir1698 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* Add test - not passing

* Add comments and testdata dir

* Make the tests pass.

* Add more tests

* Mark a line for future improvement
kavir1698 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* Add test - not passing

* Add comments and testdata dir

* Make the tests pass.

* Add more tests

* Check illegal characters

* Fix the tests

* Add test for checkMetadata function (#4)

* Add test - not passing

* Add comments and testdata dir

* Make the tests pass.

* Add more tests

* Mark a line for future improvement

* Bump golang.org/x/crypto from 0.3.0 to 0.17.0 (#19)

Bumps [golang.org/x/crypto](https://github.com/golang/crypto) from 0.3.0 to 0.17.0.
- [Commits](golang/crypto@v0.3.0...v0.17.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/crypto
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

* Add dummy email

---------

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants